Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-02-09 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
Disabling ACPI (all of power management, really. SMP so no APM) seems to have made it work in 2.4.1 for me. On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: > Do you have framebuffer console compiled into your kernel? I noticed > similar behavior on my system when I had framebuffer console

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-02-09 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: > Do you have framebuffer console compiled into your kernel? I noticed > similar behavior on my system when I had framebuffer console compiled in, > ACPI or APM (cant remember which, probably ACPI) compiled in, and bttv as > modules. System would

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-02-09 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
Do you have framebuffer console compiled into your kernel? I noticed similar behavior on my system when I had framebuffer console compiled in, ACPI or APM (cant remember which, probably ACPI) compiled in, and bttv as modules. System would power off when ACPI was loaded. Other times it would do

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-02-09 Thread Dr. Kelsey Hudson
Do you have framebuffer console compiled into your kernel? I noticed similar behavior on my system when I had framebuffer console compiled in, ACPI or APM (cant remember which, probably ACPI) compiled in, and bttv as modules. System would power off when ACPI was loaded. Other times it would do

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-02-09 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: Do you have framebuffer console compiled into your kernel? I noticed similar behavior on my system when I had framebuffer console compiled in, ACPI or APM (cant remember which, probably ACPI) compiled in, and bttv as modules. System would power

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-02-09 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
Disabling ACPI (all of power management, really. SMP so no APM) seems to have made it work in 2.4.1 for me. On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Dr. Kelsey Hudson wrote: Do you have framebuffer console compiled into your kernel? I noticed similar behavior on my system when I had framebuffer console compiled

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1 PAL_BG

2001-01-31 Thread archan
ok!! archan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Jasen wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, archan wrote: > >> I am using "Pixel View TV tuner card" based on "bttv". It works perfect >> in Windows with default TV application, and also responding well in >> Linux 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test10 kernel.

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread adrian
On 31 Jan 2001, Gerd Knorr wrote: > > The card is a video only capture that came with a camera (and has a > > connector to power that camera next to the video connector). > > Sure the box is really dead? These very cheap cards with just the bt848 [snip] > some sanity checks on the i2c bus

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread Gerd Knorr
> The card is a video only capture that came with a camera (and has a > connector to power that camera next to the video connector). Sure the box is really dead? These very cheap cards with just the bt848 and nothing else often have a non-working i2c bus (because they have no chips connected to

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread Prasanna P Subash
My bttv is at IRQ 3 and it still hangs the machine :( I dont even have acpi built in. btw I am testing with 2.4.1-pre9 -- Prasanna Subash --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- TurboLinux, INC Linux, the choice |

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1 PAL_BG

2001-01-31 Thread John Jasen
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, archan wrote: > I am using "Pixel View TV tuner card" based on "bttv". It works perfect > in Windows with default TV application, and also responding well in > Linux 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test10 kernel. The device is getting detected > perfectly by 2.4 kernel but I could not be

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread adrian
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, adrian wrote: > > >I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results: > > 2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The > > card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1 PAL_BG

2001-01-31 Thread archan
I am using "Pixel View TV tuner card" based on "bttv". It works perfect in Windows with default TV application, and also responding well in Linux 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test10 kernel. The device is getting detected perfectly by 2.4 kernel but I could not be able to check whether the card in 2.4

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread Gerd Knorr
> > > I have sent all this info to Gerd Knorr but, as far as I know, he hasn't > > > been able to track down the bug yet. I thought that by posting here, > > > more eyes might at least make more reports of similar situations that > > > might help track down the problem. > > > > Try flipping the

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread Gerd Knorr
I have sent all this info to Gerd Knorr but, as far as I know, he hasn't been able to track down the bug yet. I thought that by posting here, more eyes might at least make more reports of similar situations that might help track down the problem. Try flipping the card into a

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread adrian
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, adrian wrote: I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results: 2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the card

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1 PAL_BG

2001-01-31 Thread John Jasen
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, archan wrote: I am using "Pixel View TV tuner card" based on "bttv". It works perfect in Windows with default TV application, and also responding well in Linux 2.2.17 and 2.4.0-test10 kernel. The device is getting detected perfectly by 2.4 kernel but I could not be able

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread Prasanna P Subash
My bttv is at IRQ 3 and it still hangs the machine :( I dont even have acpi built in. btw I am testing with 2.4.1-pre9 -- Prasanna Subash --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- TurboLinux, INC Linux, the choice |

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread Gerd Knorr
The card is a video only capture that came with a camera (and has a connector to power that camera next to the video connector). Sure the box is really dead? These very cheap cards with just the bt848 and nothing else often have a non-working i2c bus (because they have no chips connected to

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-31 Thread adrian
On 31 Jan 2001, Gerd Knorr wrote: The card is a video only capture that came with a camera (and has a connector to power that camera next to the video connector). Sure the box is really dead? These very cheap cards with just the bt848 [snip] some sanity checks on the i2c bus first

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, adrian wrote: >I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results: > 2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The > card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the card initialized and the > kernel continued to boot.

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread adrian
Hmmm, I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results: 2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the card initialized and the kernel continued to boot. Interesting. Regards, Adrian On Tue, 30

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread Prasanna P Subash
I have experienced similar issues with 2.4.0 and its test. I have a bttv848 chipset. I even tried compiling in kdb as a part of the kernel to see if it oopses, but no luck. I will try trying 0.7.47 today. this works on 2.2.16, last time i tried. -- Prasanna Subash --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Jasen wrote: > On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote: > > > These errors all occur in the same way (as near as I can tell) in > > kernels 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, using bttv drivers 0.7.50 (incl. w/ kernel), > > 0.7.53, and 0.7.55. > > > > I am currently using

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread John Jasen
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote: > These errors all occur in the same way (as near as I can tell) in > kernels 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, using bttv drivers 0.7.50 (incl. w/ kernel), > 0.7.53, and 0.7.55. > > I am currently using 2.4.0-test10 with bttv 0.7.47, which works fine. > > I have

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread John Jasen
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote: These errors all occur in the same way (as near as I can tell) in kernels 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, using bttv drivers 0.7.50 (incl. w/ kernel), 0.7.53, and 0.7.55. I am currently using 2.4.0-test10 with bttv 0.7.47, which works fine. I have sent all

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, John Jasen wrote: On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Matthew Gabeler-Lee wrote: These errors all occur in the same way (as near as I can tell) in kernels 2.4.0 and 2.4.1, using bttv drivers 0.7.50 (incl. w/ kernel), 0.7.53, and 0.7.55. I am currently using 2.4.0-test10 with

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread Prasanna P Subash
I have experienced similar issues with 2.4.0 and its test. I have a bttv848 chipset. I even tried compiling in kdb as a part of the kernel to see if it oopses, but no luck. I will try trying 0.7.47 today. this works on 2.2.16, last time i tried. -- Prasanna Subash --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread adrian
Hmmm, I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results: 2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the card initialized and the kernel continued to boot. Interesting. Regards, Adrian On Tue, 30

Re: bttv problems in 2.4.0/2.4.1

2001-01-30 Thread Matthew Gabeler-Lee
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, adrian wrote: I have a bt848 based video capture card, and get near the same results: 2.4.0-test10 through 2.4.1 all lock when i2c registers the device. The card has its own interrupt. With 2.2.18, the card initialized and the kernel continued to boot. Interesting.