On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 04:19:52PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series is based on a patch from Linus to split the callbacks
> passed to walk_page_range and walk_page_vma into a separate structure
> that can be marked const, with various cleanups from me on top.
>
> This
On 28/08/2019 00:36, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 04:34:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:34:13 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +, Jason
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 11:36:26PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Okay, I'll get it on a branch and merge it toward hmm.git tomorrow
I was planning to resend it with the rebase, especially as the build
bot picked a build error in task_mmu.c where we were missing a stub
for an unusual
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 04:34:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:34:13 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > > So what is the plan
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:34:13 + Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > > So what is the plan forward? Probably a little late for 5.3,
> > > > so queue it up in -mm
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 03:26:55PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > So what is the plan forward? Probably a little late for 5.3,
> > > so queue it up in -mm for 5.4 and deal with the conflicts in at least
> > > hmm? Queue it
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:43:12PM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > So what is the plan forward? Probably a little late for 5.3,
> > so queue it up in -mm for 5.4 and deal with the conflicts in at least
> > hmm? Queue it up in the hmm tree even if it doesn't 100% fit?
>
> Did we make a
On 23/08/2019 14:43, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:27:51PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
this series is based on a patch from Linus to
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:27:51PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >
> > > this series is based on a patch from Linus to split the callbacks
> > > passed to
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:41 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> I certainly prefer that method of API change :-)
> (see the current "keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with
> an ACL" in linux-next
Side note: I will *not* be pulling that again.
It was broken last time, and without more
Hi Christoph,
On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 08:43:01 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 04:41:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > I certainly prefer that method of API change :-)
> > (see the current "keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with
> > an ACL" in
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 04:41:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> I certainly prefer that method of API change :-)
> (see the current "keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with
> an ACL" in linux-next and the (currently) three merge fixup patches I
> am carrying. Its not bad when
Hi all,
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:06:23 -0700 Andrew Morton
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:32:58 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:57:40AM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Are there conflicts with trees other than hmm?
> > >
> > > We can put it on a topic
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:32:58 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:57:40AM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > Are there conflicts with trees other than hmm?
> >
> > We can put it on a topic branch and merge to hmm to resolve. If hmm
> > has problems then send the topic on
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 5:33 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> I see two new walk_page_range user in linux-next related to MADV_COLD
> support (which probably really should use walk_range_vma), and then
> there is the series from Steven, which hasn't been merged yet.
It does sound like this might
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:57:40AM +, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Are there conflicts with trees other than hmm?
>
> We can put it on a topic branch and merge to hmm to resolve. If hmm
> has problems then send the topic on its own?
I see two new walk_page_range user in linux-next related to
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:27:51PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > >
> > > this series is based on a patch from Linus to split the callbacks
> > > passed to
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > this series is based on a patch from Linus to split the callbacks
> > passed to walk_page_range and walk_page_vma into a separate structure
> > that can be marked
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 11:56:32PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Note that both Thomas and Steven have series touching this area pending,
> > > and there are a couple consumer in flux too - the hmm tree already
> > >
On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 12:21:24AM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
> On 8/8/19 11:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Note that both Thomas and Steven have series touching this area pending,
and there are a couple consumer in
On 8/8/19 11:56 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Note that both Thomas and Steven have series touching this area pending,
and there are a couple consumer in flux too - the hmm tree already
conflicts with this series, and I have
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 10:50:37AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Note that both Thomas and Steven have series touching this area pending,
> > and there are a couple consumer in flux too - the hmm tree already
> > conflicts with this series, and I have potential dma changes on top of
> > the
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 8:42 AM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> this series is based on a patch from Linus to split the callbacks
> passed to walk_page_range and walk_page_vma into a separate structure
> that can be marked const, with various cleanups from me on top.
The whole series looks good to
23 matches
Mail list logo
