In list.kernel, axel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>How about correcting the needed gcc version in Documentation/Changes?
Linux, with up to date documention?? In your dreams perhaps.
>On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> > after having had trouble with compilation due to old gcc version,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (bcc: Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec)
Subject: Re: compile error 2.4.4pre6: inconsistent operand constraints in an
> after having had trouble with compilation due to old gcc version, i have
> updated to gcc 3.0 and received the following error:
2.4.4pre6 only builds with gcc
How about correcting the needed gcc version in Documentation/Changes?
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > after having had trouble with compilation due to old gcc version, i have
> > updated to gcc 3.0 and received the following error:
>
> 2.4.4pre6 only builds with gcc 2.96. If you apply
On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> 2.4.4pre6 only builds with gcc 2.96. If you apply the __builtin_expect fixes
> it builds and runs fine with 2.95. Not tried egcs. The gcc 3.0 asm constraints
> one I've yet to see a fix for.
So, should I upgrade to 2.96 from 2.95.3?
But, from http://gcc.gn
> after having had trouble with compilation due to old gcc version, i have
> updated to gcc 3.0 and received the following error:
2.4.4pre6 only builds with gcc 2.96. If you apply the __builtin_expect fixes
it builds and runs fine with 2.95. Not tried egcs. The gcc 3.0 asm constraints
one I've ye
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 11:11:14PM +0200, axel wrote:
> after having had trouble with compilation due to old gcc version, i have
> updated to gcc 3.0 and received the following error:
Although bug reports about a kernel compiled with gcc-3.0 are welcome,
this is still not the recommended compiler
6 matches
Mail list logo
