Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/21/2007 04:18 PM: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> ... >> tags >> 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 >> 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 >> 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 >> 6 weeks ago v2.6.23

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Kay Sievers wrote, On 11/21/2007 05:06 PM: > On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jakub Narebski
Petr Baudis wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> ... >> tags >> 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 >> 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 >> 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 >> 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 >>

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Kay Sievers
On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this > > > shouldn't be

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Petr Baudis
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > ... > tags > 4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 > 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 > 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 > 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 > > which drives me crazy,

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > Of course, you are right, and I probably miss something, but to be > sure we think about the same thing let's look at some example: so, I > open a page with current Linus' tree, go to something titled: > /pub/scm /

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... Of course, you are right, and I probably miss something, but to be sure we think about the same thing let's look at some example: so, I open a page with current Linus' tree, go to something titled: /pub/scm /

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Petr Baudis
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... tags 4 days agov2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 which drives me crazy, because,

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Kay Sievers
On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this shouldn't be so 'heavy'.

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jakub Narebski
Petr Baudis wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... tags 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux 2.6.23 which drives

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Kay Sievers wrote, On 11/21/2007 05:06 PM: On Nov 21, 2007 8:52 AM, Jarek Poplawski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-21 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/21/2007 04:18 PM: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:52:17AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... tags 4 days ago v2.6.24-rc3 Linux 2.6.24-rc3 2 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc2 Linux 2.6.24-rc2 4 weeks ago v2.6.24-rc1 Linux 2.6.24-rc1 6 weeks ago v2.6.23 Linux

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this > > shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit > > date by querying

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this > shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit > date by querying a small database with kernel versions & dates. If I create a commit in

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/20/2007 10:59 PM: > Hi, > > On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: >> I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but >> there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm >> very often interested in which

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Petr Baudis
Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but > there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm > very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch > appeared

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Petr Baudis
Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm very often interested in which kernel version of Linus' tree the patch appeared for

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Jarek Poplawski
Petr Baudis wrote, On 11/20/2007 10:59 PM: Hi, On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:20:42PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I see gitweb is much more usable (faster) than a few months ago, but there is one thing a bit problematic: in the history of patches I'm very often interested in which kernel

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit date by querying a small database with kernel versions dates. If I create a commit in my

Re: gitweb: kernel versions in the history (feature request, probably)

2007-11-20 Thread Jarek Poplawski
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 10:20:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 12:30:23AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: I don't know git, but it seems, at least if done for web only, this shouldn't be so 'heavy'. It could be a 'simple' translation of commit date by querying a