what the bug is, and whether there is some other work-around, and whether
it is 100% certain that it is just those two controllers (maybe the other
ones are buggy too, but the 2.2.x tests basically cured their symptoms too
and peopl ehaven't reported them because they are "fixed").
I've not
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:25:28 + (GMT)
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch
what the bug is, and whether
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, John Heil wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:25:28 + (GMT)
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 16:52:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Heil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ide.2.4.1-p3.01112001.patch
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, John Heil wrote:
Yes, initially the 686a was problematic, now with an 80 wire cable its
fine.
One point of clarification... I started out with a simple hdparm -d1
which failed 85% of the time. I added the other stuff only to enhance the
-d0 state I was left with.
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
I told you that I have the new code that is scheduled for 2.5 certified on
analizers to be technically correct as it relates to the "state diagrams"
in the standard.
"Technically correct" and "state diagrams as in the standard" mean less
that
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
I told you that I have the new code that is scheduled for 2.5 certified on
analizers to be technically correct as it relates to the "state diagrams"
in the standard.
"Technically correct" and
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
It works perfectly and exactly as it is defined to work by the rules.
Getting the rules correct == 'the concept of "working"'.
Don't be silly.
You're entirely ignoring the concept of hardware bugs. Which is one very
likely reason for this whole
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
It works perfectly and exactly as it is defined to work by the rules.
Getting the rules correct == 'the concept of "working"'.
Don't be silly.
You're entirely ignoring the concept of hardware
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
It works perfectly and exactly as it is defined to work by the rules.
Getting the rules correct == 'the concept of "working"'.
Don't be silly.
You're entirely ignoring the concept of hardware
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
|The system is an AMD K6-3 on a FIC PA-2013 mobo with 3 IDE disks. The
|size of hda is 4.3 GB, the size of hdb is 854 MB and the size of hdc is
|1.2 GB. Hdd is an IDE CDROM drive
I think its significant that two reports I have are FIC PA-2013 but not
On 12 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andre Hedrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that "experimental patch" is designed to get out of the dreaded
"DMA Timeout Hang" or deadlock that is most noted by the PIIX4 on the
Intel 440*X Chipset groups. Since it
101 - 112 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
