On 8/12/13 11:10 AM, "Jon Mason" wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:18:03PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> Le 02/08/2013 19:47, Dan Williams a écrit :
>> > Yup, but should also fold in the deletions of the other is_xeon_cb32()
>> > alignment fixups further below.
>> >
>> > Actually all the
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:18:03PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 02/08/2013 19:47, Dan Williams a écrit :
> > Yup, but should also fold in the deletions of the other is_xeon_cb32()
> > alignment fixups further below.
> >
> > Actually all the alignment settings can be removed now.
> >
> > ...and
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:18:03PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 02/08/2013 19:47, Dan Williams a écrit :
Yup, but should also fold in the deletions of the other is_xeon_cb32()
alignment fixups further below.
Actually all the alignment settings can be removed now.
...and the
On 8/12/13 11:10 AM, Jon Mason jon.ma...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 09:18:03PM +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 02/08/2013 19:47, Dan Williams a écrit :
Yup, but should also fold in the deletions of the other is_xeon_cb32()
alignment fixups further below.
Actually all the
Le 02/08/2013 19:47, Dan Williams a écrit :
> Yup, but should also fold in the deletions of the other is_xeon_cb32()
> alignment fixups further below.
>
> Actually all the alignment settings can be removed now.
>
> ...and the PQ_VAL/XOR_VAL fixup for is_xeon_cb32() can go.
Ok, here's another one,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 04:57:44PM +, Dan Williams wrote:
>
>
> On 8/2/13 12:34 AM, "Brice Goglin" wrote:
>
> >Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
> >> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
> I'm
Le 02/08/2013 18:57, Dan Williams a écrit :
> I like Jon¹s suggestion. Just make raid disabled by default on non-atom
> platforms. When if a non-atom platform comes along without the previous
> restrictions it can add itself to this list.
>
> So let¹s drop the module parameter and just cleanup
On 8/2/13 10:26 AM, "Brice Goglin" wrote:
>Le 02/08/2013 18:57, Dan Williams a écrit :
>> I like Jon¹s suggestion. Just make raid disabled by default on non-atom
>> platforms. When if a non-atom platform comes along without the previous
>> restrictions it can add itself to this list.
>>
>>
On 8/2/13 12:34 AM, "Brice Goglin" wrote:
>Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
>> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
RAID.
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 16:57 +, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> On 8/2/13 12:34 AM, "Brice Goglin" wrote:
>
> >Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
> >> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
> I'm ok with
That looks fine.
Acked-by: Dave Jiang
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 09:34 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
> >>> I'm ok with enabling this for
Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
> On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
>>> I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
>>> RAID.
>> I might be crazy, but I'd be in favor of
That looks fine.
Acked-by: Dave Jiang dave.ji...@intel.com
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 09:34 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm ok with
On Fri, 2013-08-02 at 16:57 +, Dan Williams wrote:
On 8/2/13 12:34 AM, Brice Goglin brice.gog...@inria.fr wrote:
Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm ok with
On 8/2/13 12:34 AM, Brice Goglin brice.gog...@inria.fr wrote:
Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
On 8/2/13 10:26 AM, Brice Goglin brice.gog...@inria.fr wrote:
Le 02/08/2013 18:57, Dan Williams a écrit :
I like Jon¹s suggestion. Just make raid disabled by default on non-atom
platforms. When if a non-atom platform comes along without the previous
restrictions it can add itself to this
Le 02/08/2013 18:57, Dan Williams a écrit :
I like Jon¹s suggestion. Just make raid disabled by default on non-atom
platforms. When if a non-atom platform comes along without the previous
restrictions it can add itself to this list.
So let¹s drop the module parameter and just cleanup the
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 04:57:44PM +, Dan Williams wrote:
On 8/2/13 12:34 AM, Brice Goglin brice.gog...@inria.fr wrote:
Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm
Le 02/08/2013 19:47, Dan Williams a écrit :
Yup, but should also fold in the deletions of the other is_xeon_cb32()
alignment fixups further below.
Actually all the alignment settings can be removed now.
...and the PQ_VAL/XOR_VAL fixup for is_xeon_cb32() can go.
Ok, here's another one, but
Le 01/08/2013 19:15, Jiang, Dave a écrit :
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
RAID.
I might be crazy, but I'd be in favor of disabling the RAID
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
> > I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
> > RAID.
>
> I might be crazy, but I'd be in favor of disabling the RAID offload by
> default on non-Atom
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
> I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
> RAID.
I might be crazy, but I'd be in favor of disabling the RAID offload by
default on non-Atom platforms.
Thanks,
Jon
>
> Acked-by: Dave Jiang
>
> On
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
RAID.
I might be crazy, but I'd be in favor of disabling the RAID offload by
default on non-Atom platforms.
Thanks,
Jon
Acked-by: Dave Jiang
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 10:11 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 03:14:07PM -0700, Jiang, Dave wrote:
I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
RAID.
I might be crazy, but I'd be in favor of disabling the RAID offload by
default on non-Atom
I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
RAID.
Acked-by: Dave Jiang
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 00:05 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
> ioatdma: add ioat_raid_enabled module parameter
>
> Commit f26df1a1 added a 64-byte alignment requirement for legacy
> operations to work
I'm ok with enabling this for people that just want to use DMA and not
RAID.
Acked-by: Dave Jiang dave.ji...@intel.com
On Thu, 2013-08-01 at 00:05 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote:
ioatdma: add ioat_raid_enabled module parameter
Commit f26df1a1 added a 64-byte alignment requirement for legacy
26 matches
Mail list logo
