Hi Masahiro,
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 13:44:19 +0900 Masahiro Yamada
wrote:
>
> Stephen, could you revert this commit for today's linux-next ?
Sorry, I discovered your email too late :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpsF4ld4i1FG.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Heiko, Stephen,
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:53 AM Heiko Carstens wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 06:17:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20190807:
> >
> > I reverted a commit from the kbuild-current tree by request.
>
> Hello Masahiro,
>
> it looks like
On Thu, Aug 08, 2019 at 06:17:39PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20190807:
>
> I reverted a commit from the kbuild-current tree by request.
Hello Masahiro,
it looks like there is (another?) bug in kbuild. With your patch
commit
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:51:22 +1000 Andrew Donnellan
wrote:
>
> On 08/08/16 13:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Please do not add material destined for v4.9 to your linux-next included
> > branches until after v4.8-rc1 has been released.
>
> Which has
Hi Andrew,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:51:22 +1000 Andrew Donnellan
wrote:
>
> On 08/08/16 13:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Please do not add material destined for v4.9 to your linux-next included
> > branches until after v4.8-rc1 has been released.
>
> Which has now happened :)
Yes, I will
On 08/08/16 13:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Please do not add material destined for v4.9 to your linux-next included
branches until after v4.8-rc1 has been released.
Which has now happened :)
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com IBM Australia
On 08/08/16 13:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Please do not add material destined for v4.9 to your linux-next included
branches until after v4.8-rc1 has been released.
Which has now happened :)
--
Andrew Donnellan OzLabs, ADL Canberra
andrew.donnel...@au1.ibm.com IBM Australia
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:01:49AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> > Randy,
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> >> On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:01:49AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Randy,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
> >> > Randy,
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:01:49AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Randy,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
Randy,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:01:49AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Randy,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Randy,
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
>> > Randy,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> >> On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Jason Cooper ja...@lakedaemon.net wrote:
Randy,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
Randy,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell
On 08/09/13 11:50, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Randy,
>
> On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
>>> Randy,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi
Randy,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
> > Randy,
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20130807:
> >>>
>
On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
> Randy,
>
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130807:
>>>
>>
>> on i386 and x86_64:
>> when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
>>
>> There are many of
Randy,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130807:
> >
>
> on i386 and x86_64:
> when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
>
> There are many of these errors:
> include/linux/msi.h:65:6:
Randy,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130807:
on i386 and x86_64:
when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
There are many of these errors:
include/linux/msi.h:65:6: error: expected
On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
Randy,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130807:
on i386 and x86_64:
when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
There are many of these errors:
Randy,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
Randy,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130807:
on i386 and x86_64:
On 08/09/13 11:50, Jason Cooper wrote:
Randy,
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:41:38AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/09/13 07:59, Jason Cooper wrote:
Randy,
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20130807:
> >
>
> on i386 and x86_64:
> when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
>
> There are many of these errors:
> include/linux/msi.h:65:6: error:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20130807:
>
on i386 and x86_64:
when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
There are many of these errors:
include/linux/msi.h:65:6: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'void'
include/linux/msi.h:65:6: error: expected ')'
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130807:
on i386 and x86_64:
when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
There are many of these errors:
include/linux/msi.h:65:6: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'void'
include/linux/msi.h:65:6: error: expected ')' before
On Thu, Aug 08, 2013 at 01:03:04PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On 08/08/13 00:08, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130807:
on i386 and x86_64:
when CONFIG_PCI_MSI is not enabled:
There are many of these errors:
include/linux/msi.h:65:6: error: expected identifier
25 matches
Mail list logo