Hi Ian,
Once again - apologies for multiple copies of this email. Please reply
to this (plain text) version so it will get through LKML filters.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ian Munsie wrote:
>
>
> > CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o
>
> Is this correct? i.e. Are you building perf for x86?
Hi Ian,
Once again - apologies for multiple copies of this email. Please reply
to this (plain text) version so it will get through LKML filters.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Ian Munsie imun...@au1.ibm.com wrote:
CC arch/x86/util/dwarf-regs.o
Is this correct? i.e. Are you building perf
Hey Ben,
Adding some people to CC...
Excerpts from Ben Guthro's message of 2012-10-02 11:02:59 +1000:
> I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f -
> but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3
Building that SHA works for me (on x86, haven't tried PPC
Hey Ben,
Adding some people to CC...
Excerpts from Ben Guthro's message of 2012-10-02 11:02:59 +1000:
I pulled the latest bits up to 797b9e5ae93270ec27a1f1ed48cd697d01b2269f -
but am seeing the following build failure with gcc 4.6.3
Building that SHA works for me (on x86, haven't tried PPC
4 matches
Mail list logo