Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 29 June 2007 04:30:21 Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > You could have a link in > > "Old" as requested, and any other links as well. > > Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are > stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want > to use really old tarballs in any

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: Alex: Okay -- I've set up a script that ensures that the "Archive" directory (was "Old") always includes links to the latest versions of the pages, so you can be guaranteed that links in Archive should always be stable (I don't know that I'll ever actually remove files

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Michael Kerrisk
> > Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are > > stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want > > to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for > > the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about > > moving tarballs into "Old" (I'll leave them sitting in

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are stable "for a while" (since I don't suppose that they want to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about moving tarballs into "Old" (I'll leave them

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Michael Kerrisk
Bill, > >> There is one little problem with this: there is no stable URL for a > >> given version. > > > > Well, there never really was. To date, most old tarballs have > > had only a limited life on kernel.org. > > > Why? I'm not questioning the policy, it's just that if HUGE kernel >

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Michael Kerrisk
Bill, There is one little problem with this: there is no stable URL for a given version. Well, there never really was. To date, most old tarballs have had only a limited life on kernel.org. Why? I'm not questioning the policy, it's just that if HUGE kernel versions are kept

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are stable for a while (since I don't suppose that they want to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about moving tarballs into Old (I'll leave them sitting

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: Alex: Okay -- I've set up a script that ensures that the Archive directory (was Old) always includes links to the latest versions of the pages, so you can be guaranteed that links in Archive should always be stable (I don't know that I'll ever actually remove files from

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Michael Kerrisk
Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are stable for a while (since I don't suppose that they want to use really old tarballs in any case). So, for the benefit of LFS, I'll just be less aggressive about moving tarballs into Old (I'll leave them sitting in

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-29 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 29 June 2007 04:30:21 Michael Kerrisk wrote: You could have a link in Old as requested, and any other links as well. Well, I think all that LFS seems to want is links that are stable for a while (since I don't suppose that they want to use really old tarballs in any case). What

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Bill Davidsen
Michael Kerrisk wrote: Alexander, I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. These releases are now available for download at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages Yes, just this morning I decided to tidy away some of the old tarballs into a newly created "old"

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Michael Kerrisk
> Michael Kerrisk wrote: > > How about a link in /pub/linux/docs/manpages/ of the form > > "LATEST-IS-m.xy"? Rob Landley was wanting something like this, > > and I guess it would be easy for LFS to build a simple > > script that looks for that link and deduces "man-pages-m.xy" > > from it.

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: How about a link in /pub/linux/docs/manpages/ of the form "LATEST-IS-m.xy"? Rob Landley was wanting something like this, and I guess it would be easy for LFS to build a simple script that looks for that link and deduces "man-pages-m.xy" from it. (I've just now created

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Michael Kerrisk
Alexander, > > I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. > > > > These releases are now available for download at: > > > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages Yes, just this morning I decided to tidy away some of the old tarballs into a newly created "old" directory. >

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. These releases are now available for download at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages There is one little problem with this: there is no stable URL for a given version. This hurts, e.g., automated Linux

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. These releases are now available for download at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages There is one little problem with this: there is no stable URL for a given version. This hurts, e.g., automated Linux

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Michael Kerrisk
Alexander, I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. These releases are now available for download at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages Yes, just this morning I decided to tidy away some of the old tarballs into a newly created old directory. There is one

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Michael Kerrisk wrote: How about a link in /pub/linux/docs/manpages/ of the form LATEST-IS-m.xy? Rob Landley was wanting something like this, and I guess it would be easy for LFS to build a simple script that looks for that link and deduces man-pages-m.xy from it. (I've just now created such

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Michael Kerrisk
Michael Kerrisk wrote: How about a link in /pub/linux/docs/manpages/ of the form LATEST-IS-m.xy? Rob Landley was wanting something like this, and I guess it would be easy for LFS to build a simple script that looks for that link and deduces man-pages-m.xy from it. (I've just now

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-28 Thread Bill Davidsen
Michael Kerrisk wrote: Alexander, I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. These releases are now available for download at: http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages Yes, just this morning I decided to tidy away some of the old tarballs into a newly created old

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-26 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 25 June 2007 05:50:07 Michael Kerrisk wrote: > Gidday, > > I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. Could you make a man-pages-latest symlink in the download directory? I'm trying to keep an HTML copy of this (converted with doclifter) up to date (It'll be on

Re: man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60 are released

2007-06-26 Thread Rob Landley
On Monday 25 June 2007 05:50:07 Michael Kerrisk wrote: Gidday, I just released man-pages-2.59 and man-pages-2.60. Could you make a man-pages-latest symlink in the download directory? I'm trying to keep an HTML copy of this (converted with doclifter) up to date (It'll be on