Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I did some benchmarks, and my framebuffer is *way* faster when writing
> than when reading:
>
> root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /tmp/test > /dev/fb0
> 0.01user 0.08system 0.09 (0m0.097s) elapsed 93.13%CPU
> root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
>
Hi!
I did some benchmarks, and my framebuffer is *way* faster when writing
than when reading:
root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /tmp/test > /dev/fb0
0.01user 0.08system 0.09 (0m0.097s) elapsed 93.13%CPU
root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /dev/fb0 > /dev/null
0.00user 0.62system 0.62 (0m0.620s) elapsed
Hi!
I did some benchmarks, and my framebuffer is *way* faster when writing
than when reading:
root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /tmp/test /dev/fb0
0.01user 0.08system 0.09 (0m0.097s) elapsed 93.13%CPU
root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /dev/fb0 /dev/null
0.00user 0.62system 0.62 (0m0.620s) elapsed
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I did some benchmarks, and my framebuffer is *way* faster when writing
than when reading:
root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /tmp/test /dev/fb0
0.01user 0.08system 0.09 (0m0.097s) elapsed 93.13%CPU
root@bug:/home/pavel# time cat /dev/fb0 /dev/null
0.00user
4 matches
Mail list logo