On Sunday 21 January 2007 10:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > I preffer
> > to stay on "stable" kernel on boxes which I use daily until next stable
> > appears.
>
> This is a very weird statement, the -rt kernel includes so much
> experimental work it cannot be called 'stable' by a long shot.
>
>
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 00:39 +0100, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Sunil and Ingo,
>
> Date: 2007-01-20 02:56:40 GMT (20 hours and 26 minutes ago)
> > 2007-01-20, Sunil Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
> > 2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 00:39 +0100, Pavel Pisa wrote:
Hello Sunil and Ingo,
Date: 2007-01-20 02:56:40 GMT (20 hours and 26 minutes ago)
2007-01-20, Sunil Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with
On Sunday 21 January 2007 10:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I preffer
to stay on stable kernel on boxes which I use daily until next stable
appears.
This is a very weird statement, the -rt kernel includes so much
experimental work it cannot be called 'stable' by a long shot.
Sure its not
Hello Sunil and Ingo,
Date: 2007-01-20 02:56:40 GMT (20 hours and 26 minutes ago)
> 2007-01-20, Sunil Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
> 2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt
> patch?
>
> If yes,
Hello Sunil and Ingo,
Date: 2007-01-20 02:56:40 GMT (20 hours and 26 minutes ago)
2007-01-20, Sunil Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt
patch?
If yes, any reason
On 1/18/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the best place to start is:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
Ingo
I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt
patch?
If yes, any reason why we
On 1/18/07, Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the best place to start is:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
Ingo
I did refer the same. Is it necessary to use only base kernel, say
2.6.19? Or, can I go ahead with 2.6.19 + 2.6.19.2 patch + 2.6.19-rt
patch?
If yes, any reason why we need
* Sunil Naidu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I would like to try with patch-2.6.20-rc5-rt7 for an experiment to
> measure the latency. Is there any documentation or help which talks
> about patching, issues, and latency benchmarks?
the best place to start is:
Hi Ingo,
I would like to try with patch-2.6.20-rc5-rt7 for an experiment to
measure the latency.
Is there any documentation or help which talks about patching, issues,
and latency benchmarks?
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a
Hi Ingo,
I would like to try with patch-2.6.20-rc5-rt7 for an experiment to
measure the latency.
Is there any documentation or help which talks about patching, issues,
and latency benchmarks?
~Akula2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
* Sunil Naidu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo,
I would like to try with patch-2.6.20-rc5-rt7 for an experiment to
measure the latency. Is there any documentation or help which talks
about patching, issues, and latency benchmarks?
the best place to start is:
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
