On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, 22 October 2007 16:11, Mark Lord wrote:
> > Rafael,
> >
> > What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK?
> > Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend,
> > or just leave it be with whatever?
> >
> > The
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, 22 October 2007 16:11, Mark Lord wrote:
Rafael,
What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK?
Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend,
or just leave it be with whatever?
The answer has to
On Monday, 22 October 2007 16:11, Mark Lord wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK?
> Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend,
> or just leave it be with whatever?
>
> The answer has to be "restore the value it had at suspend time",
>
Rafael,
What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK?
Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend,
or just leave it be with whatever?
The answer has to be "restore the value it had at suspend time",
but I figured I'd check here anyway.
??
-
To unsubscribe from
Rafael,
What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK?
Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend,
or just leave it be with whatever?
The answer has to be restore the value it had at suspend time,
but I figured I'd check here anyway.
??
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Monday, 22 October 2007 16:11, Mark Lord wrote:
Rafael,
What happens to the jiffies variable on resume from RAM, and from DISK?
Do we restore it to the value it had at suspend,
or just leave it be with whatever?
The answer has to be restore the value it had at suspend time,
but I
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9,
resume-from-RAM has been misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume
*sometimes*, but not all/most of the time.
I suspend those long delays may have something to do with USB,
as it takes longer for my
Hi!
> Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9,
> resume-from-RAM has been misbehaving here.
>
> It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume
> *sometimes*, but not all/most of the time.
> And sometimes I get get flashing keyboard LEDs and have
> to hold the power button
> in for a full
Hi!
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9,
resume-from-RAM has been misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume
*sometimes*, but not all/most of the time.
And sometimes I get get flashing keyboard LEDs and have
to hold the power button
in for a full hard
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9,
resume-from-RAM has been misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume
*sometimes*, but not all/most of the time.
I suspend those long delays may have something to do with USB,
as it takes longer for my
On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 00:10, Mark Lord wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
> > Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
> >>> Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
> >>> misbehaving here.
> >>>
> >>> It takes much (+5-7
Mark Lord wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not
all/most of the time.
And sometimes I get
Mark Lord wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not
all/most of the time.
And sometimes I get
On Wednesday, 17 October 2007 00:10, Mark Lord wrote:
Mark Lord wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not all/most of
the time.
And sometimes I get get flashing
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
> Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
> misbehaving here.
>
> It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not all/most
> of the time.
> And sometimes I get get flashing keyboard LEDs and have
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not all/most of
the time.
And sometimes I get get flashing keyboard LEDs and have to hold the power button
in for a full hard reset.
With
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not all/most of
the time.
And sometimes I get get flashing keyboard LEDs and have to hold the power button
in for a full hard reset.
With
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not all/most
of the time.
And sometimes I get get flashing keyboard LEDs and have to
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 14 October 2007 22:13, Mark Lord wrote:
Since upgrading to 2.6.23.1 from 2.6.23-rc9, resume-from-RAM has been
misbehaving here.
It takes much (+5-7 seconds) longer to resume *sometimes*, but not all/most of
the time.
And sometimes I get get flashing
20 matches
Mail list logo
