On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 00:16 -0800, Ray Lee wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
> > it's something that got fixed between -rc3
On Dec 14, 2007 11:09 PM, Ray Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct, absolutely no traffic. So if it works for you, then either
> it's something that got fixed between -rc3 and -rc5, or something odd
> when I did a make oldconfig, I
On Dec 14, 2007 6:41 PM, Gabriel C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >> tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
> >> fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
> >> (-rc5) doesn'
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
>> tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
>> fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
>> (-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
>> I'll check
On Friday, 14 of December 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
> fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
> (-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
> I'll check current tip on the weekend when
tshark -i eth0, eth1, lo are all empty. Works under 2.6.23.0 just
fine. A quick scan of the log between 2.6.24-rc3 and current tip
(-rc5) doesn't show any obvious fixes, but then again, what do I know.
I'll check current tip on the weekend when I'll have the luxury to
have my main system down long
6 matches
Mail list logo
