Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> Okay, reverted.
Thanks.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:45:42PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2014 08:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > /--
> > | > > Right, so, with Assabet, which has CONFIG_DMA_ZONE=y and
> > | > >
On Monday 06 January 2014 08:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Russell,
On Monday 06 January 2014 08:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Russell, Santosh,
the
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 12:45:42PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 08:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
/--
| Right, so, with Assabet, which has CONFIG_DMA_ZONE=y and
|
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
Okay, reverted.
Thanks.
--
Krzysztof Halasa
Research Institute for Automation and Measurements PIAP
Al. Jerozolimskie 202, 02-486 Warsaw, Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> >> Russell, Santosh,
> >>
> >> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Russell, Santosh,
>
> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
> compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
>
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
>> Russell, Santosh,
>>
>> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
>> compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:08 PM, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Santosh Shilimkar writes:
>
>> I am afraid you didn't understood what the fix is if you say above.
>> arm_dma_limit is broken without this fix for LPAE machines with
>> memory starting 4 GB physical boundary.
>
> I wonder what
Santosh Shilimkar writes:
> I am afraid you didn't understood what the fix is if you say above.
> arm_dma_limit is broken without this fix for LPAE machines with
> memory starting 4 GB physical boundary.
I wonder what CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and CONFIG_ZONE_DMA do they
use?
Of course,
On Monday 06 January 2014 02:28 PM, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> Russell, Santosh,
>
> the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
> compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
> CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
>
>
Russell, Santosh,
the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
Please be aware that this commit fixes nothing, its only function is
causing
Russell, Santosh,
the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
Please be aware that this commit fixes nothing, its only function is
causing
On Monday 06 January 2014 02:28 PM, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Russell, Santosh,
the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
Please be
Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com writes:
I am afraid you didn't understood what the fix is if you say above.
arm_dma_limit is broken without this fix for LPAE machines with
memory starting 4 GB physical boundary.
I wonder what CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and CONFIG_ZONE_DMA do they
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:08 PM, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com writes:
I am afraid you didn't understood what the fix is if you say above.
arm_dma_limit is broken without this fix for LPAE machines with
memory starting 4 GB physical boundary.
I
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Russell, Santosh,
the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Russell, Santosh,
the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try to
compile an ARM kernel without CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT and with
CONFIG_ZONE_DMA and see for yourself, if you don't believe me.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 06:42:13PM -0500, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Monday 06 January 2014 05:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
Russell, Santosh,
the unneeded commit causing regression is still in place. Please try
Russell King - ARM Linux writes:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
>> arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use
>> in this function)
>>
>> Reverting the following commit
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use
in this function)
Reverting the following
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
> arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
> arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use in
> this function)
>
> Reverting the following commit fixes it:
Already fixed long before
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use in
this function)
Reverting the following commit fixes it:
commit 787b0d5c1ca7ff24feb6f92e4c7f4410ee7d81a8
Author: Santosh Shilimkar
Date: Mon Dec 2 20:29:12 2013
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use in
this function)
Reverting the following commit fixes it:
commit 787b0d5c1ca7ff24feb6f92e4c7f4410ee7d81a8
Author: Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com
Date: Mon
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0100, Krzysztof Hałasa wrote:
arch/arm/mm/init.c: In function 'setup_dma_zone':
arch/arm/mm/init.c:232:19: error: '__pv_phys_offset' undeclared (first use in
this function)
Reverting the following commit fixes it:
Already fixed long before Christmas.
26 matches
Mail list logo