On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Am Mi den 18. Feb 2015 um 16:39 schrieb Jani Nikula:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>> > After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
>> > v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
Am Mi den 18. Feb 2015 um 16:39 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also
On to, 2015-02-19 at 15:42 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> >> On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
> >>> On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
>> On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
>>> On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
> On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
> > On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> >>> After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
> >>> v3.18.7. I think it
On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
> On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
>>> After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
>>> v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
>>> patch,
On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I
On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert
On to, 2015-02-19 at 15:42 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 19/02/15 11:08, Deak, Imre wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 10:47 +, Dave Gordon wrote:
On 18/02/15 16:24, Imre Deak wrote:
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 20:03 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am Mi den 18. Feb 2015 um 16:39 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > > After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
> > > v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Mi den 18. Feb 2015 um 16:39 schrieb Jani Nikula:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
> > v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> > After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
> > v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
> > patch, suspend is working again on that version.
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
> v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
> patch, suspend is working again on that version.
>
> However, I have not to deep knowledge of that subsystem,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Mi den 18. Feb 2015 um 16:39 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current
On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 20:03 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Hi,
Am Mi den 18. Feb 2015 um 16:39 schrieb Jani Nikula:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to
On ke, 2015-02-18 at 17:39 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
patch, suspend is working again on
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
patch, suspend is working again on that version.
However, I have not to deep knowledge of
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
patch, suspend is working again on that version.
However, I have not to deep knowledge of that subsystem, so please,
someone who have, have a deeper look
After solving the conflicts, I applied the revert (see attachment) to
v3.18.7. I think it should also apply to the current head. With that
patch, suspend is working again on that version.
However, I have not to deep knowledge of that subsystem, so please,
someone who have, have a deeper look
ccing some ppl.
On 17 February 2015 at 08:11, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> After three days of bisect I found the bug for my problem with a broken
> suspend on x61p of lenovo.
>
> The problem is commit e11aa36. It seems to be a wrong assumption
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
After three days of bisect I found the bug for my problem with a broken
suspend on x61p of lenovo.
The problem is commit e11aa36. It seems to be a wrong assumption that
disabling the interrupts is enough.
I'll try to revert the commit on top of
ccing some ppl.
On 17 February 2015 at 08:11, Klaus Ethgen klaus+l...@ethgen.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
After three days of bisect I found the bug for my problem with a broken
suspend on x61p of lenovo.
The problem is commit e11aa36. It seems to be a wrong
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
After three days of bisect I found the bug for my problem with a broken
suspend on x61p of lenovo.
The problem is commit e11aa36. It seems to be a wrong assumption that
disabling the interrupts is enough.
I'll try to revert the commit on top of
24 matches
Mail list logo
