As other posts have pointed out, if you have BAD HDMA cables, you will
experience problems. One thing I would suggest is that you
add kernel.*/dev/console to your /etc/syslog.conf so that you see
any errors resulting from the kernel code. Also I would suggest that you
open another
Hi!
> I partitioned the 2 drives (on 1st and 2nd controller, both 1.3 GB each)
> into 4 total partitions. 1st is swap and then the next 3, 1 primary, 2
> extended are for raid 1 arrays. I've given 20 MB to /boot (md0), 650MB
> to / (md1) and the rest (400+MB) to /var (md2). I format md0 as
As other posts have pointed out, if you have BAD HDMA cables, you will
experience problems. One thing I would suggest is that you
add kernel.*/dev/console to your /etc/syslog.conf so that you see
any errors resulting from the kernel code. Also I would suggest that you
open another
Hi!
I partitioned the 2 drives (on 1st and 2nd controller, both 1.3 GB each)
into 4 total partitions. 1st is swap and then the next 3, 1 primary, 2
extended are for raid 1 arrays. I've given 20 MB to /boot (md0), 650MB
to / (md1) and the rest (400+MB) to /var (md2). I format md0 as ext2
From: "Tom Sightler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
>> >latest updates, etc. and kernel
Colonel wrote:
>Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:45:02 -0600
>From: "James A. Pattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Colonel wrote:
>
>>>There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
>>>low. It seems to be
Colonel wrote:
>>There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
>>low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
>> or MM related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
>> issues. This would explain
Colonel wrote:
There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
or MM related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
issues. This would explain why the
Colonel wrote:
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:45:02 -0600
From: "James A. Pattie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Colonel wrote:
There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
low. It seems to be undetermined if this
From: "Tom Sightler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
>There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
>low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
> or MM related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
> issues. This would explain why the same disk would
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 22:21, Colonel wrote:
>From: "Tom Sightler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:07 -0500
>Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>>> >I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of
From: "Tom Sightler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
>> >I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
>> >latest updates, etc. and kernel
Tom Sightler wrote:
> > > There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
> > > low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
> or MM
> > > related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
> issues.
> > > This would explain why
> > There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
> > low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
or MM
> > related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
issues.
> > This would explain why the same disk would work on a
Tom Sightler wrote:
> >> >I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
> >> >latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
> >> >I've built a customized install of RH (~200MB) which I untar onto
> the
> >> >system after building my raid arrays, etc. via a Rescue
>> >I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
>> >latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
>> >I've built a customized install of RH (~200MB) which I untar onto
the
>> >system after building my raid arrays, etc. via a Rescue CD which I
>> >created
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:32:19 -0600
From: "James A. Pattie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Colonel wrote:
> In clouddancer.list.kernel.owner, you wrote:
> >
> >I'm not subscribed to the
Colonel wrote:
> In clouddancer.list.kernel.owner, you wrote:
> >
> >I'm not subscribed to the kernel mailing list, so please cc any replies
> >to me.
> >
> >I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
> >latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
> >I've built a customized
Colonel wrote:
In clouddancer.list.kernel.owner, you wrote:
I'm not subscribed to the kernel mailing list, so please cc any replies
to me.
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
I've built a customized install of RH
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:32:19 -0600
From: "James A. Pattie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Colonel wrote:
In clouddancer.list.kernel.owner, you wrote:
I'm not subscribed to the kernel
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
I've built a customized install of RH (~200MB) which I untar onto
the
system after building my raid arrays, etc. via a Rescue CD which I
created using Timo's
Tom Sightler wrote:
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
I've built a customized install of RH (~200MB) which I untar onto
the
system after building my raid arrays, etc. via a Rescue CD which I
There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
or MM
related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
issues.
This would explain why the same disk would work on a different
Tom Sightler wrote:
There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
or MM
related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
issues.
This would explain why the same disk
From: "Tom Sightler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
On Tuesday 20 February 2001 22:21, Colonel wrote:
From: "Tom Sightler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 14:43:07 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH
There seem to be several reports of reiserfs falling over when memory is
low. It seems to be undetermined if this problem is actually reiserfs
or MM related, but there are other threads on this list regarding similar
issues. This would explain why the same disk would work
I'm not subscribed to the kernel mailing list, so please cc any replies
to me.
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
I've built a customized install of RH (~200MB) which I untar onto the
system after building my raid arrays,
I'm not subscribed to the kernel mailing list, so please cc any replies
to me.
I'm building a firewall on a P133 with 48 MB of memory using RH 7.0,
latest updates, etc. and kernel 2.4.1.
I've built a customized install of RH (~200MB) which I untar onto the
system after building my raid arrays,
30 matches
Mail list logo
