Re: Remove apparently dead CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY code.

2007-05-03 Thread Alan Cox
On Thu, 3 May 2007 13:53:06 -0400 (EDT) "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Remove the single snippet of code conditional on the non-existent > CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY Kconfig variable. > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> NAK This option is not dead and is releva

Re: Remove apparently dead CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY code.

2007-05-03 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 3 May 2007 13:53:06 -0400 (EDT) Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > Remove the single snippet of code conditional on the non-existent > CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY Kconfig variable. > > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > i would have mailed a note about this to the ATA

Remove apparently dead CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY code.

2007-05-03 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Remove the single snippet of code conditional on the non-existent CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY Kconfig variable. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- i would have mailed a note about this to the ATA maintainer but it wasn't clear who that was. this is the only dead CONFIG_ variabl