> If you want to be more general than kzalloc, then perhaps
> zalloc-simple.cocci would be ok.
Are you going to commit such a file name adjustment when it seems
that you would not like to accept any other suggestion there?
Regards,
Markus
> If you want to be more general than kzalloc, then perhaps
> zalloc-simple.cocci would be ok.
Are you going to commit such a file name adjustment when it seems
that you would not like to accept any other suggestion there?
Regards,
Markus
>> * I am unsure which name will be better finally.
>> Would we like to achieve another permalink here?
>
> Actually, according to th original name choice it is stillsimple,
The involved contributors have got different views if the available script
remains “simple” enough at the moment.
>
>> * I am unsure which name will be better finally.
>> Would we like to achieve another permalink here?
>
> Actually, according to th original name choice it is stillsimple,
The involved contributors have got different views if the available script
remains “simple” enough at the moment.
>
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Now I find that it became more advanced than the previous version.
> >> How do you think about to update also the corresponding file name
> >> (instead of keeping the word “simple” there)?
> >
> > Why not send a patch for it yourself?
>
> * I
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Now I find that it became more advanced than the previous version.
> >> How do you think about to update also the corresponding file name
> >> (instead of keeping the word “simple” there)?
> >
> > Why not send a patch for it yourself?
>
> * I
>> Now I find that it became more advanced than the previous version.
>> How do you think about to update also the corresponding file name
>> (instead of keeping the word “simple” there)?
>
> Why not send a patch for it yourself?
* I would like to check your views around renaming of such files.
>> Now I find that it became more advanced than the previous version.
>> How do you think about to update also the corresponding file name
>> (instead of keeping the word “simple” there)?
>
> Why not send a patch for it yourself?
* I would like to check your views around renaming of such files.
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A script for the semantic patch language was extended in significant ways.
>
> [PATCH v2] Coccinelle: kzalloc-simple: Add “all” zero allocating functions
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/26/182
>
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> Hello,
>
> A script for the semantic patch language was extended in significant ways.
>
> [PATCH v2] Coccinelle: kzalloc-simple: Add “all” zero allocating functions
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/26/182
>
Hello,
A script for the semantic patch language was extended in significant ways.
[PATCH v2] Coccinelle: kzalloc-simple: Add “all” zero allocating functions
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/26/182
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10133277/
Hello,
A script for the semantic patch language was extended in significant ways.
[PATCH v2] Coccinelle: kzalloc-simple: Add “all” zero allocating functions
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/26/182
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10133277/
12 matches
Mail list logo
