Re: Return value of __mm_populate

Hi, Il 14/04/2013 02:18, KOSAKI Motohiro ha scritto: (4/13/13 5:14 AM), Marco Stornelli wrote: Hi, I was seeing the code of __mm_populate (in -next) and I've got a doubt about the return value. The function __mlock_posix_error_return should return a proper error for mlock, converting the

Re: Return value of __mm_populate

Hi, Il 14/04/2013 02:18, KOSAKI Motohiro ha scritto: (4/13/13 5:14 AM), Marco Stornelli wrote: Hi, I was seeing the code of __mm_populate (in -next) and I've got a doubt about the return value. The function __mlock_posix_error_return should return a proper error for mlock, converting the

Re: Return value of __mm_populate

(4/13/13 5:14 AM), Marco Stornelli wrote: > Hi, > > I was seeing the code of __mm_populate (in -next) and I've got a doubt > about the return value. The function __mlock_posix_error_return should > return a proper error for mlock, converting the return value from > __get_user_pages. It checks

Re: Return value of __mm_populate

Adding in cc: lkml Il 13/04/2013 14:14, Marco Stornelli ha scritto: Hi, I was seeing the code of __mm_populate (in -next) and I've got a doubt about the return value. The function __mlock_posix_error_return should return a proper error for mlock, converting the return value from

Re: Return value of __mm_populate

Adding in cc: lkml Il 13/04/2013 14:14, Marco Stornelli ha scritto: Hi, I was seeing the code of __mm_populate (in -next) and I've got a doubt about the return value. The function __mlock_posix_error_return should return a proper error for mlock, converting the return value from

Re: Return value of __mm_populate

(4/13/13 5:14 AM), Marco Stornelli wrote: Hi, I was seeing the code of __mm_populate (in -next) and I've got a doubt about the return value. The function __mlock_posix_error_return should return a proper error for mlock, converting the return value from __get_user_pages. It checks for