"Kay Sievers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That cruft is going away with the block patch in your tree.
And it doesn't matter because it is a separate mount anyway.
Although I have to admit I hadn't taken that mount into
account earlier.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Dec 2, 2007 11:53 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:22:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
> > >> On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:22:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
> >> On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> > > and where is a detailed explaination on
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
>> On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>> > > and where is a detailed explaination on kern_mount? could someone give
>> > > some comments or documentation pointers on this?
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
and where is a detailed explaination on kern_mount? could someone give
some comments or documentation pointers on this?
See the
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:22:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
and where is a detailed explaination on kern_mount? could someone
On Dec 2, 2007 11:53 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 03:22:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Kay Sievers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That cruft is going away with the block patch in your tree.
And it doesn't matter because it is a separate mount anyway.
Although I have to admit I hadn't taken that mount into
account earlier.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
> On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> > > and where is a detailed explaination on kern_mount? could someone give
> > > some comments or documentation pointers on this?
> >
> > See the patches that Eric Biederman
On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> > and where is a detailed explaination on kern_mount? could someone give
> > some comments or documentation pointers on this?
>
> See the patches that Eric Biederman just posted to lkml for why this
> structure is a static pointer
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:31:09AM +0800, rae l wrote:
> ---
> and I still have questions about this code:
> 1. Why here kern_mount is needed?
> Or the first time user space `mount -t sysfs` won't do that?
> 2. If root executes many mounts to mount sysfs on /sys and many other places,
>
---
and I still have questions about this code:
1. Why here kern_mount is needed?
Or the first time user space `mount -t sysfs` won't do that?
2. If root executes many mounts to mount sysfs on /sys and many other places,
are there many instances of struct vfsmount those have only
---
and I still have questions about this code:
1. Why here kern_mount is needed?
Or the first time user space `mount -t sysfs` won't do that?
2. If root executes many mounts to mount sysfs on /sys and many other places,
are there many instances of struct vfsmount those have only
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 04:31:09AM +0800, rae l wrote:
---
and I still have questions about this code:
1. Why here kern_mount is needed?
Or the first time user space `mount -t sysfs` won't do that?
2. If root executes many mounts to mount sysfs on /sys and many other places,
are
On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
and where is a detailed explaination on kern_mount? could someone give
some comments or documentation pointers on this?
See the patches that Eric Biederman just posted to lkml for why this
structure is a static pointer this way
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 02:52:17PM +0800, rae l wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007 12:48 PM, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
and where is a detailed explaination on kern_mount? could someone give
some comments or documentation pointers on this?
See the patches that Eric Biederman just posted
16 matches
Mail list logo