On 08/03, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
>
> Thanks, it works on the rc7 kernel.
Great!
I didn't have time today, will write the changelog and send the patch
tomorrow.
Thanks a lot Aleksei.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On 08/03, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
Thanks, it works on the rc7 kernel.
Great!
I didn't have time today, will write the changelog and send the patch
tomorrow.
Thanks a lot Aleksei.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On 02 Aug 2014, at 11:19, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/31, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
>>
>> On 31 Jul 2014, at 00:43, David Rientjes wrote:
>>
>>> The while_each_thread() in vm_is_stack() looks suspicious since the task
>>> isn't current and rcu won't protect the iteration, and we also don't
On 02 Aug 2014, at 11:19, Oleg Nesterov o...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/31, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
On 31 Jul 2014, at 00:43, David Rientjes rient...@google.com wrote:
The while_each_thread() in vm_is_stack() looks suspicious since the task
isn't current and rcu won't protect the iteration,
On 07/31, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
>
> On 31 Jul 2014, at 00:43, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > The while_each_thread() in vm_is_stack() looks suspicious since the task
> > isn't current and rcu won't protect the iteration, and we also don't hold
> > sighand lock or a readlock on tasklist_lock.
> >
On 07/31, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
On 31 Jul 2014, at 00:43, David Rientjes rient...@google.com wrote:
The while_each_thread() in vm_is_stack() looks suspicious since the task
isn't current and rcu won't protect the iteration, and we also don't hold
sighand lock or a readlock on
On 31 Jul 2014, at 00:43, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
>> I'm getting weird soft lockups while reading smaps on loaded systems with
>> some background cgroups usage. This issue can be reproduced with the most
>> recent kernel.
>>
>> Here's the stack
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
> I'm getting weird soft lockups while reading smaps on loaded systems with
> some background cgroups usage. This issue can be reproduced with the most
> recent kernel.
>
> Here's the stack trace:
> [ 1748.312052] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for
I'm getting weird soft lockups while reading smaps on loaded systems with
some background cgroups usage. This issue can be reproduced with the most
recent kernel.
Here's the stack trace:
[ 1748.312052] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 23s! [python2.7:1857]
[ 1748.312052] Modules linked in: xfs
I'm getting weird soft lockups while reading smaps on loaded systems with
some background cgroups usage. This issue can be reproduced with the most
recent kernel.
Here's the stack trace:
[ 1748.312052] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 23s! [python2.7:1857]
[ 1748.312052] Modules linked in: xfs
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
I'm getting weird soft lockups while reading smaps on loaded systems with
some background cgroups usage. This issue can be reproduced with the most
recent kernel.
Here's the stack trace:
[ 1748.312052] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 23s!
On 31 Jul 2014, at 00:43, David Rientjes rient...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Aleksei Besogonov wrote:
I'm getting weird soft lockups while reading smaps on loaded systems with
some background cgroups usage. This issue can be reproduced with the most
recent kernel.
Here's the
12 matches
Mail list logo