On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday March 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check
running at?
Around 44MB/s.
I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
processes to 'stay alive'?
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday March 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you look at cat /proc/mdstat ?? What sort of speed was the check
running at?
Around 44MB/s.
I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
processes to 'stay alive'?
echo
On Thursday March 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> > Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check
> > running at?
> Around 44MB/s.
>
> I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
> processes to 'stay alive'?
>
> echo "Setting minimum
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check
> >running at?
> Around 44MB/s.
>
> I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
> processes to 'stay alive'?
>
> echo "Setting minimum resync speed to
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Did you look at "cat /proc/mdstat" ?? What sort of speed was the check
running at?
Around 44MB/s.
I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
processes to 'stay
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday March 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran a check on my SW RAID devices this morning. However, when I did so,
I had a few lftp sessions open pulling files. After I executed the check,
the lftp processes entered 'D' state and I could do
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
On Tuesday March 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran a check on my SW RAID devices this morning. However, when I did so,
I had a few lftp sessions open pulling files. After I executed the check,
the lftp processes entered 'D' state and I could do
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Did you look at cat /proc/mdstat ?? What sort of speed was the check
running at?
Around 44MB/s.
I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
processes to 'stay
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote:
Did you look at cat /proc/mdstat ?? What sort of speed was the check
running at?
Around 44MB/s.
I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
processes to 'stay alive'?
echo Setting minimum resync speed to 200MB/s...
On Thursday March 29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you look at cat /proc/mdstat ?? What sort of speed was the check
running at?
Around 44MB/s.
I do use the following optimization, perhaps a bad idea if I want other
processes to 'stay alive'?
echo Setting minimum resync speed to
On Tuesday March 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I ran a check on my SW RAID devices this morning. However, when I did so,
> I had a few lftp sessions open pulling files. After I executed the check,
> the lftp processes entered 'D' state and I could do 'nothing' in the
> process until the
On Tuesday March 27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran a check on my SW RAID devices this morning. However, when I did so,
I had a few lftp sessions open pulling files. After I executed the check,
the lftp processes entered 'D' state and I could do 'nothing' in the
process until the check
I ran a check on my SW RAID devices this morning. However, when I did so,
I had a few lftp sessions open pulling files. After I executed the check,
the lftp processes entered 'D' state and I could do 'nothing' in the
process until the check finished. Is this normal? Should a check block
I ran a check on my SW RAID devices this morning. However, when I did so,
I had a few lftp sessions open pulling files. After I executed the check,
the lftp processes entered 'D' state and I could do 'nothing' in the
process until the check finished. Is this normal? Should a check block
14 matches
Mail list logo
