On 7/20/12 9:07 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> Eric Sandeen writes:
>
>> I got this oops & stack overrun warning while running mkfs.ext4 on a sparse
>> 4T file hosted on xfs.
>>
>> Should CFQ be issuing IO here?
>
> Yes. The on-stack plugging gets flushed when a process is scheduled
> out.
Eric Sandeen writes:
> I got this oops & stack overrun warning while running mkfs.ext4 on a sparse
> 4T file hosted on xfs.
>
> Should CFQ be issuing IO here?
Yes. The on-stack plugging gets flushed when a process is scheduled
out. Seriously, Eric, all of that xfs stuff in the stack trace,
Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com writes:
I got this oops stack overrun warning while running mkfs.ext4 on a sparse
4T file hosted on xfs.
Should CFQ be issuing IO here?
Yes. The on-stack plugging gets flushed when a process is scheduled
out. Seriously, Eric, all of that xfs stuff in the
On 7/20/12 9:07 AM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Eric Sandeen sand...@redhat.com writes:
I got this oops stack overrun warning while running mkfs.ext4 on a sparse
4T file hosted on xfs.
Should CFQ be issuing IO here?
Yes. The on-stack plugging gets flushed when a process is scheduled
out.
I got this oops & stack overrun warning while running mkfs.ext4 on a sparse 4T
file hosted on xfs.
Should CFQ be issuing IO here?
-Eric
[10821.639839] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffb900148a0
[10821.640820] IP: [] cpuacct_charge+0xb4/0x210
[10821.640820] PGD 1c0d067 PUD
I got this oops stack overrun warning while running mkfs.ext4 on a sparse 4T
file hosted on xfs.
Should CFQ be issuing IO here?
-Eric
[10821.639839] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at fffb900148a0
[10821.640820] IP: [810a0a04] cpuacct_charge+0xb4/0x210
[10821.640820]
6 matches
Mail list logo