On Wed 04-01-17 09:40:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
[...]
> Ok, 4.10.0-0.rc2.git0.1.fc26.x86_64 is not stable (4.9.0-1.fc26.x86_64 was).
Does the same happen with the vanilla kernels?
> The VM stops working (e.g. not pingable) after around 8h (will be restarted
> automatically), happened serveral
On 23.12.2016 03:55, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update
On 23.12.2016 03:55, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:52:07PM +0100, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
> >>better).
> >>
> >>./update.sh: line 40: 1
On Sat 10-12-16 14:50:34, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
[...]
> IMHO: The OOM killer should NOT kick in even on the highest workloads if
> there is swap available.
This is not so simple. Take a heavy swap trashing situation as an
example. You still have a lot of swap space and an anonymous memory
which
On 09.12.2016 22:42, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 12/09/2016 07:01 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 18:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
[97883.882611] Mem-Info:
[97883.883747] active_anon:2915 ina
On 12/09/2016 07:01 PM, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 18:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
>>> On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> [...]
> [97883.882611] Mem-Info:
> [97883.883747] active_anon:2915 inactive_anon:3376 isolated_an
On 09.12.2016 18:30, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
[97883.882611] Mem-Info:
[97883.883747] active_anon:2915 inactive_anon:3376 isolated_anon:0
active_file:3902 inactive_file:3639 isolated_
On Fri 09-12-16 17:58:14, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > > [97883.882611] Mem-Info:
> > > [97883.883747] active_anon:2915 inactive_anon:3376 isolated_anon:0
> > > active_file:3902 inactive_file:3639 isolated_file:0
> > >
On 09.12.2016 17:09, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 16:52:07, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40:
On Fri 09-12-16 16:52:07, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
> > > better).
> > >
> > > ./update.sh: line 40: 1591
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
(does dnf clean all;dnf update)
Linux dat
On 09.12.2016 16:52, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update
${P
On 09.12.2016 14:40, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
(does dnf clean all;dnf update)
Linux dat
On Fri 09-12-16 08:06:25, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
> better).
>
> ./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
> (does dnf clean all;dnf update)
> Linux database.intern 4.9.0-0.rc8.git
Hello,
same with latest kernel rc, dnf still killed with OOM (but sometimes
better).
./update.sh: line 40: 1591 Killed ${EXE} update ${PARAMS}
(does dnf clean all;dnf update)
Linux database.intern 4.9.0-0.rc8.git2.1.fc26.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Dec 7
17:53:29 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_6
Hello,
I'm having out of memory situations with my "low memory" VMs in KVM
under Fedora (Kernel 4.7, 4.8 and also before). They started to get more
and more sensitive to OOM. I recently found the following info:
https://marius.bloggt-in-braunschweig.de/2016/11/17/linuxkernel-4-74-8-und-der-oo
Hello,
See also:
Bug 1314697 - Kernel 4.4.3-300.fc23.x86_64 is not stable inside a KVM VM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314697
Ciao,
Gerhard
On 30.11.2016 08:10, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
Hello,
I'm having out of memory situations with my "low memory" VMs in KVM
under Fedora (
18 matches
Mail list logo