Re: Still cant boot 2.6.20

2007-02-11 Thread Randy Dunlap
Willy Tarreau wrote: On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:37:31AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 11:12:34PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:02:47 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't see CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y Regards, Vito Caputo BTW, this isnt the appro

Re: Still cant boot 2.6.20

2007-02-11 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:37:31AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 11:12:34PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:02:47 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > I don't see CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y > > > > > > Regards, > > > Vito Caputo > > > > > > BTW,

Re: Still cant boot 2.6.20

2007-02-10 Thread lkml
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 11:12:34PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:02:47 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I don't see CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y > > > > Regards, > > Vito Caputo > > > > BTW, this isnt the appropriate place for asking this type of question... > > Please expl

Re: Still cant boot 2.6.20

2007-02-10 Thread Robert Hancock
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have built a number of previous kernels, but am having problems with 2.6.20. I initially tried just changing only the Processor type (so what I had done would be easy to describe). Someone on this list was kind enough to tell me that the SATA/PATA drivers were not on

Re: Still cant boot 2.6.20

2007-02-10 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 01:02:47 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't see CONFIG_BLK_DEV_INITRD=y > > Regards, > Vito Caputo > > BTW, this isnt the appropriate place for asking this type of question... Please explain why not. And please delete large parts of email that are not needed in replie