At 9:03 AM +0200 2001-05-18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >My question is which way is the more probable solution for future linux
> >kernels?
> >The low-level-approach of the "T3"-patch requires changes to the
> >scsi-drivers and the hardware-drivers but provides optimal communication
>
Hi,
Please respond to Christoph Biardzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Storage - redundant path failover / failback - quo vadis
linux?
>I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk
devices
>during the last weeks. The id
Hi,
Please respond to Christoph Biardzki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Storage - redundant path failover / failback - quo vadis
linux?
I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk
devices
during the last weeks. The idea is to use
At 9:03 AM +0200 2001-05-18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is which way is the more probable solution for future linux
kernels?
The low-level-approach of the T3-patch requires changes to the
scsi-drivers and the hardware-drivers but provides optimal communication
between the
On 2001-05-16T08:34:00,
Christoph Biardzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk devices
> during the last weeks. The idea is to use a second, redundant path to a
> storage device when the first one fails. Ideally one could also
Hi,
I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk devices
during the last weeks. The idea is to use a second, redundant path to a
storage device when the first one fails. Ideally one could also implement
load balancing with these paths.
The problem is really important
Hi,
I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk devices
during the last weeks. The idea is to use a second, redundant path to a
storage device when the first one fails. Ideally one could also implement
load balancing with these paths.
The problem is really important
On 2001-05-16T08:34:00,
Christoph Biardzki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I was investigating redundant path failover with FibreChannel disk devices
during the last weeks. The idea is to use a second, redundant path to a
storage device when the first one fails. Ideally one could also implement
8 matches
Mail list logo
