Andrey Borzenkov schrieb:
John Clark wrote:
Then quite likely it remembered lower numbers for "old" interfaces and
starts renaming with next available.
The kernel is 2.6.19.1 the at-that-moment current linux kernel.
What should I look for in terms of interface renaming.
I guess
John Clark wrote:
> Bernd Eckenfels schrieb:
>> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>>
>>> However, when the system comes up and attempt to do an ifconfig, the
>>> 'ethN' numbers
>>> have changed to a some what intermengled seriese starting with eth6...
>>> eth10.
>>>
>>
>> maybe a s
Bernd Eckenfels schrieb:
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
However, when the system comes up and attempt to do an ifconfig, the
'ethN' numbers
have changed to a some what intermengled seriese starting with eth6...
eth10.
maybe a system startup script is renaming them (in order
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> However, when the system comes up and attempt to do an ifconfig, the
> 'ethN' numbers
> have changed to a some what intermengled seriese starting with eth6...
> eth10.
maybe a system startup script is renaming them (in order to give them well
known num
On a system which has one Intel Ethernet 1 Gb interface, and 4 'Marvel',
interfaces,
during kernel initialization the interfaces indicate they have 'normal'
ethernet ethN names,
ie, eth0, eth1, eth2, eth3, eth4, eth5 are reported from the 'dmesg' output.
However, when the system comes up and at
5 matches
Mail list logo