On Sat, Jan 27 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
> Have you tried it with the modutiles 2.4.0 required by kernel 2.4.0?
It's more serious than that, MO drives and 2.4.x are no quite getting
along yet in general...
--
* Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Have you tried it with the modutiles 2.4.0 required by kernel 2.4.0?
Dale Christ wrote:
<>
[7.1.] Software:
-- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look
-- unusual then possibly you have very old versions)
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.0i586 #9 Fri Jan 26 15:07:33 CST 2001
i586
Have you tried it with the modutiles 2.4.0 required by kernel 2.4.0?
Dale Christ wrote:
Snip
[7.1.] Software:
-- Versions installed: (if some fields are empty or look
-- unusual then possibly you have very old versions)
Linux localhost.localdomain 2.4.0i586 #9 Fri Jan 26 15:07:33 CST 2001
i586
On Sat, Jan 27 2001, Scott M. Hoffman wrote:
Have you tried it with the modutiles 2.4.0 required by kernel 2.4.0?
It's more serious than that, MO drives and 2.4.x are no quite getting
along yet in general...
--
* Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* SuSE Labs
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
[1.] System lockup while trying to write to Fujitsu MO drive
(640MB IDE interface)
[2.] This works under RH7.0. Here's that I do:
insmod ide-scsi
; SCSI emulation needed here
mount /dev/sda /mnt/MO
; mount the drive
ls -la /mnt/MO
; see is anything's
[1.] System lockup while trying to write to Fujitsu MO drive
(640MB IDE interface)
[2.] This works under RH7.0. Here's that I do:
insmod ide-scsi
; SCSI emulation needed here
mount /dev/sda /mnt/MO
; mount the drive
ls -la /mnt/MO
; see is anything's out there
cp .bashrc /mnt/MO
; Copy a
6 matches
Mail list logo