On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 1:47 AM Troy Benjegerdes
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jun 3, 2019, at 4:49 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
> >
> > On Wed 29 May 2019 at 12:25, Troy Benjegerdes
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> On May 29, 2019, at 5:04 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed 29 May 2019 at 00:50, Atish Patra
> On Jun 3, 2019, at 4:49 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>
> On Wed 29 May 2019 at 12:25, Troy Benjegerdes
> wrote:
>
>>> On May 29, 2019, at 5:04 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed 29 May 2019 at 00:50, Atish Patra wrote:
>>>
On 5/28/19 8:36 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Tue,
> On Jun 3, 2019, at 4:49 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>
> On Wed 29 May 2019 at 12:25, Troy Benjegerdes
> wrote:
>
>>> On May 29, 2019, at 5:04 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed 29 May 2019 at 00:50, Atish Patra wrote:
>>>
On 5/28/19 8:36 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Tue,
On Wed 29 May 2019 at 12:25, Troy Benjegerdes
wrote:
>> On May 29, 2019, at 5:04 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>>
>> On Wed 29 May 2019 at 00:50, Atish Patra wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/28/19 8:36 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Loys Ollivier wrote:
> On Tue
> On May 29, 2019, at 5:04 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>
> On Wed 29 May 2019 at 00:50, Atish Patra wrote:
>
>> On 5/28/19 8:36 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Loys Ollivier wrote:
On Tue 28 May 2019 at 01:32, Paul Walmsley
wrote:
>
On 5/29/19 3:04 AM, Loys Ollivier wrote:
On Wed 29 May 2019 at 00:50, Atish Patra wrote:
On 5/28/19 8:36 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Loys Ollivier wrote:
On Tue 28 May 2019 at 01:32, Paul Walmsley wrote:
An update for those testing RISC-V patches:
On Wed 29 May 2019 at 00:50, Atish Patra wrote:
> On 5/28/19 8:36 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>>> On Tue 28 May 2019 at 01:32, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>>
An update for those testing RISC-V patches: here's a new branch of
On Tue 28 May 2019 at 17:35, Karsten Merker wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Loys Ollivier wrote:
>> On Tue 28 May 2019 at 01:32, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>>
>> > An update for those testing RISC-V patches: here's a new branch of
>> > riscv-pk/bbl that doesn't try to read or
On 5/28/19 8:36 AM, Karsten Merker wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 05:10:42PM +0200, Loys Ollivier wrote:
On Tue 28 May 2019 at 01:32, Paul Walmsley wrote:
An update for those testing RISC-V patches: here's a new branch of
riscv-pk/bbl that doesn't try to read or modify the DT data at all,
> On 5/28/19 1:33 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> An update for those testing RISC-V patches: here's a new branch of
> riscv-pk/bbl that doesn't try to read or modify the DT data at all, which
> should be useful until U-Boot settles down. This new riscv-pk version
> should be easier to use than the
On Tue 28 May 2019 at 01:32, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> An update for those testing RISC-V patches: here's a new branch of
> riscv-pk/bbl that doesn't try to read or modify the DT data at all, which
> should be useful until U-Boot settles down. This new riscv-pk version
> should be easier to use
An update for those testing RISC-V patches: here's a new branch of
riscv-pk/bbl that doesn't try to read or modify the DT data at all, which
should be useful until U-Boot settles down. This new riscv-pk version
should be easier to use than the previous version for those testing
I've heard from two separate people who have had trouble getting started
with BBL & open-source FSBL test flows with arbitrary DT files on the
Freedom Unleashed board. The following instructions should help get
people started.
The core issue, aside from general unfamiliarity, is that
13 matches
Mail list logo
