On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > hmmm.. the copy in my Sent folder looks fine, as does the one in the lkml
> > archive:
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/29/41
> >
> > This is distinctly weird.
>
> Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug. Probably brought on by alpine trying to
highlight the web addresses.
It doesn't always happen - between Rank 3 and Rank 4, you have an empty
line, and alpine reacted correctly to that one, but the "empty" line
between
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> hmmm.. the copy in my Sent folder looks fine, as does the one in the lkml
> archive:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/29/41
>
> This is distinctly weird.
Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug. Probably brought on by alpine trying to
highlight the web
On 2007.12.29 11:18:18 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
> > have been collected.
>
> This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
> have some
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
have been collected.
This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
have some formatting errors in your automation, where the things
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
have been collected.
This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
have some formatting errors in your automation, where the things
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
> have been collected.
This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
have some formatting errors in your automation, where the things are
incorrectly
* Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> kerneloops.org news:
>
> * As of 2.6.24-rc6, oopses have a unique identifier which makes it
> possible to filter out duplicate reports of (and replies to) the
> same oops. Unfortunately some reporters remove this line from their
> reports
The http://www.kerneloops.org website collects kernel oops and
warning reports from various mailing lists and bugzillas as well as
with a client users can install to auto-submit oopses.
Below is a top 10 list of the oopses collected in the last 7 days.
(Reports prior to 2.6.23 have been omitted
The http://www.kerneloops.org website collects kernel oops and
warning reports from various mailing lists and bugzillas as well as
with a client users can install to auto-submit oopses.
Below is a top 10 list of the oopses collected in the last 7 days.
(Reports prior to 2.6.23 have been omitted
* Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kerneloops.org news:
* As of 2.6.24-rc6, oopses have a unique identifier which makes it
possible to filter out duplicate reports of (and replies to) the
same oops. Unfortunately some reporters remove this line from their
reports to lkml.
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
have been collected.
This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
have some formatting errors in your automation, where the things are
incorrectly
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
have been collected.
This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
have some formatting errors in your automation, where the things
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
have been collected.
This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
have some formatting errors in your automation, where the things
On 2007.12.29 11:18:18 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
It has been a quiet week due to the holidays, only 55 oops traces
have been collected.
This would be more useful if it was more readable. As it is, you seem to
have some formatting
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
hmmm.. the copy in my Sent folder looks fine, as does the one in the lkml
archive:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/29/41
This is distinctly weird.
Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug. Probably brought on by alpine trying to
highlight the web
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug. Probably brought on by alpine trying to
highlight the web addresses.
It doesn't always happen - between Rank 3 and Rank 4, you have an empty
line, and alpine reacted correctly to that one, but the empty line
between
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
hmmm.. the copy in my Sent folder looks fine, as does the one in the lkml
archive:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/12/29/41
This is distinctly weird.
Ahh, it seems to be a alpine bug. Probably brought
18 matches
Mail list logo
