Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-22 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: [snippage] > Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in > the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since > the day the were received by the kids because they've been busy > studying for the M-CAP test.

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-22 Thread Mark H. Wood
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: [snippage] Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since the day the were received by the kids because they've been busy studying for the M-CAP test. The

Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-21 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, KMF AV wrote: > ... obviously the Linux logo should be the > international symbol for the fucking retard. > > http://www.geocities.com/kmfav/ *compares URL and email address* Why would we want to make you the Linux logo? *runs like hell* cheers, Rik -- "What you're

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-21 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Ricky Beam wrote: >>the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since > >If that were really true, then the world is in trouble... one of Cisco's >largest offices is here. Nortel has a large footprint as well. > >(You should know better anyway as RedHat's

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-21 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: >112.437 ms 129.723 ms >12 bar2-loopback.Atlantaald.cw.net (208.172.66.4) 114.681 ms >119.636 ms 118.449 ms >13 interlan-technologies.Atlantaald.cw.net (208.172.72.202) 116.647 >ms 115.374 ms 113.748 ms >14 crs8-gw.cary.ilan.net (216.27.0.1)

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-21 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: 112.437 ms 129.723 ms 12 bar2-loopback.Atlantaald.cw.net (208.172.66.4) 114.681 ms 119.636 ms 118.449 ms 13 interlan-technologies.Atlantaald.cw.net (208.172.72.202) 116.647 ms 115.374 ms 113.748 ms 14 crs8-gw.cary.ilan.net (216.27.0.1) 110.314 ms

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-21 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Ricky Beam wrote: the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since If that were really true, then the world is in trouble... one of Cisco's largest offices is here. Nortel has a large footprint as well. (You should know better anyway as RedHat's offices

Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-21 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, KMF AV wrote: ... obviously the Linux logo should be the international symbol for the fucking retard. http://www.geocities.com/kmfav/ *compares URL and email address* Why would we want to make you the Linux logo? *runs like hell* cheers, Rik -- "What you're running

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread James Lewis Nance
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:45:29PM -0400, Ricky Beam wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > >Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in > If that were really true, then the world is in trouble... one of Cisco's > largest offices is here. Nortel has a

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread Ricky Beam
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: >Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in Why "can't" it? Just because it's in NC and not CA? Even CA has it's sparse areas (ok, maybe that's "a sparse area" now-a-days.) FYI, most of Cary is a townhouse/strip mall

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:06:33PM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: > With regards to this thread, looking at the headers of this post, he > appears to be posting from 216.27.3.45. Running a traceroute produces > the following: [snip] > Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:04:44AM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: > > Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account > > yanked for abuse of mailing lists. > > http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send >

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread Ragnar Hojland Espinosa
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 11:04:44AM -0700, Dan Hollis wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account yanked for abuse of mailing lists. http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send complaints to.

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 05:06:33PM +0100, Alex Buell wrote: With regards to this thread, looking at the headers of this post, he appears to be posting from 216.27.3.45. Running a traceroute produces the following: [snip] Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread Ricky Beam
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in Why "can't" it? Just because it's in NC and not CA? Even CA has it's sparse areas (ok, maybe that's "a sparse area" now-a-days.) FYI, most of Cary is a townhouse/strip mall

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-20 Thread James Lewis Nance
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 03:45:29PM -0400, Ricky Beam wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote: Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in If that were really true, then the world is in trouble... one of Cisco's largest offices is here. Nortel has a

RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Lincoln Dale
At 02:09 PM 19/10/2000 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: > > Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account > > yanked for abuse of mailing lists. > >http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send >complaints to. the original email came from 216.27.3.45. a

RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mark Haney
Hollis; Alex Buell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mark Haney wrote: > Richard Johnson wrote: > >Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in > >the whole county than have computers

RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mark Haney wrote: > Richard Johnson wrote: > >Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in > >the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since > >the day the were received by the kids because they've been busy > >studying for the

RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mark Haney
NC, or the South for that matter, is a hotbed of ignorance. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard B. Johnson Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:32 PM To: Dan Hollis Cc: Alex Buell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wro

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Donald Sharp
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:32:26PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Hollis wrote: > [Snipped...] > > > > > The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live near there > > willing to make a personal visit to the location to identify the > > individual

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Hollis wrote: [Snipped...] > > The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live near there > willing to make a personal visit to the location to identify the > individual responsible? > > -Dan "You get more respect with a kind word and a gun than a kind

Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Wayne . Brown
I have a simple solution for your problem. Just call the police and have them arrest whoever is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to use Linux and this mailing list. (That *is* the only reason you're here, right?) Then you can spend your time writing a wonderful OS of your own to

RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mark Haney
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Hollis Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:05 PM To: Alex Buell Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: > Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account >

Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Dan Hollis
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: > Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account > yanked for abuse of mailing lists. http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send complaints to. The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live

Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Kevin Buhr
KMF AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ... obviously the Linux logo should be the > international symbol for the fucking retard. Actually, this was considered. However, in those dark days, the ISO had not yet standardized the international symbol for the fucking retard. A symbol for "dimwit

TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Alex Buell
With regards to this thread, looking at the headers of this post, he appears to be posting from 216.27.3.45. Running a traceroute produces the following: [ab@chaos2]/home/httpd/html/poll # traceroute 216.27.3.45 traceroute to 216.27.3.45 (216.27.3.45), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 router

Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, KMF AV wrote: > First, the 2.4 kernel is years late and doesn't work > right, and keeps getting rewritten because it's a > festering hunk of fetid spaghetti inside. Well, in that case shut up and write your own. Second, don't hide behind a yahoo.com adress when making these

Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Timothy A. DeWees
Grow UP! Just what did you expect to acomplish by swearing at the developers? - Original Message - From: KMF AV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 11:20 AM Subject: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux > First, the

Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mordechai Ovits
'Yer funny! If only trolling paid, eh? Mordy On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 08:20:37AM -0700, KMF AV wrote: > First, the 2.4 kernel is years late and doesn't work > right, and keeps getting rewritten because it's a > festering hunk of fetid spaghetti inside. > > Then, Alan Cox suggests tossing the

"Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread KMF AV
First, the 2.4 kernel is years late and doesn't work right, and keeps getting rewritten because it's a festering hunk of fetid spaghetti inside. Then, Alan Cox suggests tossing the versioning scheme to the wind even more that it already has been: > Alan Cox did post an interesting suggestion.

Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread KMF AV
First, the 2.4 kernel is years late and doesn't work right, and keeps getting rewritten because it's a festering hunk of fetid spaghetti inside. Then, Alan Cox suggests tossing the versioning scheme to the wind even more that it already has been: Alan Cox did post an interesting suggestion. In

Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mordechai Ovits
'Yer funny! If only trolling paid, eh? Mordy On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 08:20:37AM -0700, KMF AV wrote: First, the 2.4 kernel is years late and doesn't work right, and keeps getting rewritten because it's a festering hunk of fetid spaghetti inside. Then, Alan Cox suggests tossing the

Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Timothy A. DeWees
Grow UP! Just what did you expect to acomplish by swearing at the developers? - Original Message - From: KMF AV [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 11:20 AM Subject: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux First, the 2.4 kernel is years late a

Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, KMF AV wrote: First, the 2.4 kernel is years late and doesn't work right, and keeps getting rewritten because it's a festering hunk of fetid spaghetti inside. Well, in that case shut up and write your own. Second, don't hide behind a yahoo.com adress when making these

TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Alex Buell
With regards to this thread, looking at the headers of this post, he appears to be posting from 216.27.3.45. Running a traceroute produces the following: [ab@chaos2]/home/httpd/html/poll # traceroute 216.27.3.45 traceroute to 216.27.3.45 (216.27.3.45), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 router

Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Kevin Buhr
KMF AV [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ... obviously the Linux logo should be the international symbol for the fucking retard. Actually, this was considered. However, in those dark days, the ISO had not yet standardized the international symbol for the fucking retard. A symbol for "dimwit

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Dan Hollis
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account yanked for abuse of mailing lists. http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send complaints to. The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live near

Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Wayne . Brown
I have a simple solution for your problem. Just call the police and have them arrest whoever is holding a gun to your head and forcing you to use Linux and this mailing list. (That *is* the only reason you're here, right?) Then you can spend your time writing a wonderful OS of your own to

RE: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mark Haney
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan Hollis Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:05 PM To: Alex Buell Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Alex Buell wrote: Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account yanked

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Hollis wrote: [Snipped...] The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live near there willing to make a personal visit to the location to identify the individual responsible? -Dan "You get more respect with a kind word and a gun than a kind word".

Re: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Donald Sharp
On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 02:32:26PM -0400, Richard B. Johnson wrote: On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Dan Hollis wrote: [Snipped...] The machine's physical location is in Cary, NC. Anyone live near there willing to make a personal visit to the location to identify the individual responsible?

RE: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mark Haney
, is a hotbed of ignorance. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard B. Johnson Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 2:32 PM To: Dan Hollis Cc: Alex Buell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux

RE: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mark Haney wrote: Richard Johnson wrote: Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been booted since the day the were received by the kids because they've been busy studying for the M-CAP test.

RE: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Mark Haney
Hollis; Alex Buell; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: TRACED] Re: "Tux" is the wrong logo for Linux On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Mark Haney wrote: Richard Johnson wrote: Cary, NC. can't be very large. There are, probably, three persons in the whole county than have computers. Two haven't been bo

RE: TRACED] Re: Tux is the wrong logo for Linux

2000-10-19 Thread Lincoln Dale
At 02:09 PM 19/10/2000 -0400, Mark Haney wrote: Feel free to send complaints to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and get his account yanked for abuse of mailing lists. http://www.ilan.net/contact.htm for a nice list of addresses to send complaints to. the original email came from 216.27.3.45. a quick grep