/Corporate/Altec@Altec
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UMSDOS Problem with test10-pre2
UMSDOS is broken in 2.4 in few places.
You can try to change link sequence by placing
umsdos.o
before
msdos.o
in fs/Makefile.
Then you'll get UMSDOS being registered, and possibly an oops
As I reme
ltec@Altec
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: UMSDOS Problem with test10-pre2
UMSDOS is broken in 2.4 in few places.
You can try to change link sequence by placing
umsdos.o
before
msdos.o
in fs/Makefile.
Then you'll get UMSDOS being registered, and possibly an oops
As I remember, the p
> (Certainly it did not work in test7 and I did not notice any patch for
> it since that time)
>
> Seems that it is unmaintained at the moment...
Im getting patches for 2.2 from people. I think it may just be they've not
bothered with the 2.4test tree.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
"[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:"
[...]
> Yenta IRQ list 06f8, PCI irq11
> Socket status: 3006
> Intel PCIC probe: not found.
> 3c574_cs.c v1.08 9/24/98 Donald Becker/David Hinds, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At this point with 2.3.51 I get these lines:
>
> UMSDOS 0.86 (compatibility level 0.4, fast
Apologies in advance if this is a known problem. I've been away from kernel
hacking for about three years and just re-subscribed to lkml a couple of weeks
ago, so I may have missed something about this. But I haven't been able to find
anything in the documentation or on lkml about it. If
Apologies in advance if this is a known problem. I've been away from kernel
hacking for about three years and just re-subscribed to lkml a couple of weeks
ago, so I may have missed something about this. But I haven't been able to find
anything in the documentation or on lkml about it. If
6 matches
Mail list logo
