> > I agree. I would expect it to be 8 instead of 32.
> > Actually I just checked on a new Thinkpad T20 with a TI
> > PCI 1450 CardBus controller *on a different OS*
> > and it is 8.
>
> I'll fix it to be 8.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Linus
Well, preferably to what David said:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
>
> I agree. I would expect it to be 8 instead of 32.
> Actually I just checked on a new Thinkpad T20 with a TI
> PCI 1450 CardBus controller *on a different OS*
> and it is 8.
I'll fix it to be 8.
Thanks,
Linus
-
To unsubscribe
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:22:32PM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> > I'm not familiar with yenta controllers/devices,
> > and I'm not trying to throw you a tasty red herring,
> > but...
> >
> > yenta_config_init() does
> > config_writeb(socket, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 32);
> >
> > Is this
I have tested Linus' patch and it makes a difference:
cs: cb_alloc(bus 6): vendor 0x115d, device 0x0003
Found 06:00 [115d/0003] 000200 00
bus res 0 1200 1c00-1fff
bus res 1 200 2000-23ff
bus res 2 100 1800-18ff
bus res 0 1200 1c00-1fff
bus res 1 200
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:22:32PM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
> I'm not familiar with yenta controllers/devices,
> and I'm not trying to throw you a tasty red herring,
> but...
>
> yenta_config_init() does
> config_writeb(socket, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 32);
>
> Is this writing to the CardBus
I'm not familiar with yenta controllers/devices,
and I'm not trying to throw you a tasty red herring,
but...
yenta_config_init() does
config_writeb(socket, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 32);
Is this writing to the CardBus bridge or to the device's
CacheLineSize register?
If the latter, and given
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Dag Bakke wrote:
>
> This patch enables the expansion ROM, but it still doesn't make the card
> work.
Ok. It seems that your stuck bit is really stuck, and I was wrong: it's
not the cardbus bridge that does something strange, it actually looks like
your hardware has a
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 02:22:32PM -0700, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
I'm not familiar with yenta controllers/devices,
and I'm not trying to throw you a tasty red herring,
but...
yenta_config_init() does
config_writeb(socket, PCI_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, 32);
Is this writing to the
On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
I agree. I would expect it to be 8 instead of 32.
Actually I just checked on a new Thinkpad T20 with a TI
PCI 1450 CardBus controller *on a different OS*
and it is 8.
I'll fix it to be 8.
Thanks,
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from
I agree. I would expect it to be 8 instead of 32.
Actually I just checked on a new Thinkpad T20 with a TI
PCI 1450 CardBus controller *on a different OS*
and it is 8.
I'll fix it to be 8.
Thanks,
Linus
Well, preferably to what David said:
L1_CACHE_BYTES / 4
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Dag Bakke wrote:
>
> Linus,
> I realized there was one more test to do before deeming the hardware sane.
>
> PCMCIA (16-bit) in my laptop is tested and works fine with three different
> types of cards.
> Another Xircom card behaved just the same (non-functional) in my
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
> >
[snip]
> > Expansion ROM at 1800 [disabled] [size=32M]
> > Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
>
> There's something really wrong going on with your ethernet controller. It
> seems to try to take up
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
[snip]
Expansion ROM at 1800 [disabled] [size=32M]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 1
There's something really wrong going on with your ethernet controller. It
seems to try to take up all
On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Dag Bakke wrote:
Linus,
I realized there was one more test to do before deeming the hardware sane.
PCMCIA (16-bit) in my laptop is tested and works fine with three different
types of cards.
Another Xircom card behaved just the same (non-functional) in my latop.
My
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
>
> > drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c to allocate more than 4MB of PCI memory window.
> [snip]
>
> > align = size = 32*1024*1024;
> Done.
> Didn't work. But it certainly made a difference.
>
> lspci -v now says:
>
> 06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Xircom
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
> > 2.4.0-test9/10p1
>
> Can you do another test with this (ie in-kernel pcmcia), AND enable
> debugging in both drivers/pci/pci.c and in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h (in
[snip]
> drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c to allocate more than 4MB of PCI
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
>
> Tested with:
> 2.2.18pre15 + pcmcia-cs 3.1.21
> 2.4.0-test9/10p1
Can you do another test with this (ie in-kernel pcmcia), AND enable
debugging in both drivers/pci/pci.c and in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h (in
both cases, just change the #undef DEBUG to a
Keywords: cardbus, dell, xircom, pci, resources
In short:
Xircom Realport cardbus cards still do not work under Linux in (my) Dell
Latitude CPi laptop. A problem indication shows up even before loading
the xircom driver. This is not the Latitude docking-station problem,
which has been
noted by
Keywords: cardbus, dell, xircom, pci, resources
In short:
Xircom Realport cardbus cards still do not work under Linux in (my) Dell
Latitude CPi laptop. A problem indication shows up even before loading
the xircom driver. This is not the Latitude docking-station problem,
which has been
noted by
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
Tested with:
2.2.18pre15 + pcmcia-cs 3.1.21
2.4.0-test9/10p1
Can you do another test with this (ie in-kernel pcmcia), AND enable
debugging in both drivers/pci/pci.c and in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h (in
both cases, just change the #undef DEBUG to a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
2.4.0-test9/10p1
Can you do another test with this (ie in-kernel pcmcia), AND enable
debugging in both drivers/pci/pci.c and in arch/i386/kernel/pci-i386.h (in
[snip]
drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c to allocate more than 4MB of PCI memory
On Wed, 11 Oct 2000, Dag B wrote:
drivers/pcmcia/yenta.c to allocate more than 4MB of PCI memory window.
[snip]
align = size = 32*1024*1024;
Done.
Didn't work. But it certainly made a difference.
lspci -v now says:
06:00.0 Ethernet controller: Xircom Cardbus Ethernet
22 matches
Mail list logo
