On Sunday 18 November 2007 15:32:03 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
> > > link? (Or a bit more specificity
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
> > link? (Or a bit more specificity than "a few weeks ago"?)
>
> Here are the three patches:
>
>
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
link? (Or a bit more specificity than a few weeks ago?)
Here are the three patches:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
link? (Or a bit more specificity than a few
On Sunday 18 November 2007 15:32:03 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 02:17:49PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Saturday 17 November 2007 12:53:57 Jeff Dike wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this,
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
> link? (Or a bit more specificity than "a few weeks ago"?)
Here are the three patches:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arch=119342916329510=2
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 04:00:22PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
I wasn't cc'd, and missed it. I'd like to test this, do you have a
link? (Or a bit more specificity than a few weeks ago?)
Here are the three patches:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-archm=119342916329510w=2
On Friday 16 November 2007 09:51:08 Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Rob, I'll queue this up for the next cycle, now that you've verified
> > that it was not fixed already, thanks for testing.
>
> I wouldn't.
>
> sparc includes swap.h in its
On Friday 16 November 2007 01:15:27 Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:01:43PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:08:32 WANG Cong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > >Hm, not good. I'll let Jeff handle this :)
> > >
> > >
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:51:08AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Rob, I'll queue this up for the next cycle, now that you've verified
> > that it was not fixed already, thanks for testing.
>
> I wouldn't.
>
> sparc includes swap.h in its
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Rob, I'll queue this up for the next cycle, now that you've verified
> that it was not fixed already, thanks for testing.
I wouldn't.
sparc includes swap.h in its pgtable.h. Adding pagemap.h to swap.h
completes an include loop on sparc
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:12:57AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:08:32AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
>> Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> diff --git
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:08:32AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
> Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
> index 4f3838a..2c3ce4c
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Rob, I'll queue this up for the next cycle, now that you've verified
that it was not fixed already, thanks for testing.
I wouldn't.
sparc includes swap.h in its pgtable.h. Adding pagemap.h to swap.h
completes an include loop on sparc
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:12:57AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:08:32AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 11:08:32AM +0800, WANG Cong wrote:
Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h
index 4f3838a..2c3ce4c 100644
---
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 10:51:08AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Rob, I'll queue this up for the next cycle, now that you've verified
that it was not fixed already, thanks for testing.
I wouldn't.
sparc includes swap.h in its pgtable.h.
On Friday 16 November 2007 01:15:27 Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:01:43PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:08:32 WANG Cong wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, not good. I'll let Jeff handle this :)
Could you
On Friday 16 November 2007 09:51:08 Jeff Dike wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:15:27PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Rob, I'll queue this up for the next cycle, now that you've verified
that it was not fixed already, thanks for testing.
I wouldn't.
sparc includes swap.h in its pgtable.h. Adding
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:01:43PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:08:32 WANG Cong wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > >Hm, not good. I'll let Jeff handle this :)
> >
> > Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
> >
> >
On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:08:32 WANG Cong wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >Hm, not good. I'll let Jeff handle this :)
>
> Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oh what a good idea.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:57:21PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
>> On Thursday 15 November 2007 00:02:55 Greg KH wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
>> > > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:57:21PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Thursday 15 November 2007 00:02:55 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob
On Thursday 15 November 2007 00:02:55 Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it
On Thursday 15 November 2007 00:02:55 Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:57:21PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007 00:02:55 Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:57:21PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007 00:02:55 Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
On
On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:08:32 WANG Cong wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, not good. I'll let Jeff handle this :)
Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
Signed-off-by: WANG Cong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh what a good idea.
Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 11:01:43PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Thursday 15 November 2007 21:08:32 WANG Cong wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 01:06:08PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, not good. I'll let Jeff handle this :)
Could you please try this patch? Can it fix the error?
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
> > >
> > > CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
> > >
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
> >
> > CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
> > In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
> > from
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
>
> CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
> In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
> from include/asm/tlb.h:4,
> from
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
from include/asm/tlb.h:4,
from arch/um/kernel/smp.c:8:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
from
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
In file included
Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
from include/asm/tlb.h:4,
from arch/um/kernel/smp.c:8:
include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function ‘tlb_flush_mmu’:
Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this:
CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o
In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11,
from include/asm/tlb.h:4,
from arch/um/kernel/smp.c:8:
include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function ‘tlb_flush_mmu’:
38 matches
Mail list logo
