On 10/17/07, Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:49:07 -0400
> "Lee Revell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sorry to ask this question on the list but I've Googled and found
> > nothing.
> >
> > Is system V shared memory accounted for as Cached, or as normal
> >
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:49:07 -0400
"Lee Revell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to ask this question on the list but I've Googled and found
> nothing.
>
> Is system V shared memory accounted for as Cached, or as normal
> application memory?
Cached.
Shared memory segments basically are tmpfs
Sorry to ask this question on the list but I've Googled and found nothing.
Is system V shared memory accounted for as Cached, or as normal
application memory?
I have an application that uses SysV shared memory and O_DIRECT for
all IO, but when it starts up, the cached column in vmstat seems to
Sorry to ask this question on the list but I've Googled and found nothing.
Is system V shared memory accounted for as Cached, or as normal
application memory?
I have an application that uses SysV shared memory and O_DIRECT for
all IO, but when it starts up, the cached column in vmstat seems to
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:49:07 -0400
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to ask this question on the list but I've Googled and found
nothing.
Is system V shared memory accounted for as Cached, or as normal
application memory?
Cached.
Shared memory segments basically are tmpfs files.
On 10/17/07, Rik van Riel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:49:07 -0400
Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to ask this question on the list but I've Googled and found
nothing.
Is system V shared memory accounted for as Cached, or as normal
application memory?
6 matches
Mail list logo