Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-10-01 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> this would be differemt, but AFAIK the redhat package management system is > not able to provide for this). You have no idea what you're talking about. > > So let's die this thread, or at least the name-calling right now. I'll try > as best as I can to keep the disucssion to the original,

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-10-01 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
this would be differemt, but AFAIK the redhat package management system is not able to provide for this). You have no idea what you're talking about. So let's die this thread, or at least the name-calling right now. I'll try as best as I can to keep the disucssion to the original,

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 10:57:57PM +0100, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > they were involved, but I have reason to doubt that they actually agreed. > > They did. O.k. let's disagree ;) > > This really is an affront on your side, twisting reality quite a bit - the > I noticed you

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Alan Cox
> > Various people I associate with being senior in both glibc and gcc (people > > like Ulrich Drepper and Jeff Law) were involved in the compiler and glibc > > they were involved, but I have reason to doubt that they actually agreed. They did. > > to the temporary ABI in 2.95 first -

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 08:08:40PM +0100, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > for Caldera, Transmeta, SuSE and others I expect. So I dont think you can > work on the basis they have any influence over me. The logic is not quite right, but tt's definitely another story indeed. > > the largest

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Alan Cox
> After all, even if you do work for redhat, the way redhat actively damages I work for Red Hat. I can pick up the phone any day of the week and work for Caldera, Transmeta, SuSE and others I expect. So I dont think you can work on the basis they have any influence over me. > same) and free

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Alan Cox
After all, even if you do work for redhat, the way redhat actively damages I work for Red Hat. I can pick up the phone any day of the week and work for Caldera, Transmeta, SuSE and others I expect. So I dont think you can work on the basis they have any influence over me. same) and free

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Marc Lehmann
On Sat, Sep 30, 2000 at 08:08:40PM +0100, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: for Caldera, Transmeta, SuSE and others I expect. So I dont think you can work on the basis they have any influence over me. The logic is not quite right, but tt's definitely another story indeed. the largest one,

Re: What is up with Redhat 7.0?t

2000-09-30 Thread Alan Cox
Various people I associate with being senior in both glibc and gcc (people like Ulrich Drepper and Jeff Law) were involved in the compiler and glibc they were involved, but I have reason to doubt that they actually agreed. They did. to the temporary ABI in 2.95 first - whomever that