On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Mike Galbraith
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
>> > being a LTS kernel.
>>
>> That's odd.
>
> Not
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:37 AM, Mike Galbraith
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
>> >
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
> > being a LTS kernel.
>
> That's odd.
Not really. Maintaining rt is hard work. Try it, you'll see that it
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
> being a LTS kernel.
That's odd.
--nX
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
__
>From: Thomas Gleixner
>Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 7:58 PM
>To: Jaggi, Manish
>Cc: linux-rt-users; LKML
>Subject: Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
>
>B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Jaggi, Manish wrote:
> >
> How can I help in forward porting of the patches on 4.2
I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
being a LTS kernel.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
__
>From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 7:58 PM
>To: Jaggi, Manish
>Cc: linux-rt-users; LKML
>Subject: Re: When would be preempt_rt patchet available for 4.2 kernel
>
>B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 201
On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Jaggi, Manish wrote:
> >
> How can I help in forward porting of the patches on 4.2
I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
being a LTS kernel.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
> being a LTS kernel.
That's odd.
--nX
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 19:11 +0200, Daniel Vacek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > I'm not going to support 4.2. We switched to odd numbers due to 4.1
> > being a LTS kernel.
>
> That's odd.
Not really. Maintaining rt is hard work. Try
2015-09-09 11:28 GMT-03:00 Thomas Gleixner :
> B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>> I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
>
> That's lame. I'm working on linux 5.0 kernel for my new arch/zilchcore
> platform.
linux 5.0 kernel ?
--
Albino B Neto
www.bino.us
--
B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
That's lame. I'm working on linux 5.0 kernel for my new arch/zilchcore
platform.
> Can someone please tell when would be the preempt_rt patchset be
> available for 4.2
Once the 5.0 RT
B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
That's lame. I'm working on linux 5.0 kernel for my new arch/zilchcore
platform.
> Can someone please tell when would be the preempt_rt patchset be
> available for 4.2
Once the 5.0 RT
2015-09-09 11:28 GMT-03:00 Thomas Gleixner :
> B1;2802;0cOn Wed, 9 Sep 2015, Manish Jaggi wrote:
>> I am working on linux 4.2 kernel for our ARM64 platform.
>
> That's lame. I'm working on linux 5.0 kernel for my new arch/zilchcore
> platform.
linux 5.0 kernel ?
--
Albino B
14 matches
Mail list logo