On Mon 22-05-17 02:03:21, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 05/22/2017 01:45 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Sat 20-05-17 09:26:34, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >>On Fri 19-05-17 09:46:23, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>my qemu tests of next-20170519 show the following results:
> >>> total: 122 pass: 30
On 05/22/2017 01:45 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Sat 20-05-17 09:26:34, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 19-05-17 09:46:23, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
my qemu tests of next-20170519 show the following results:
total: 122 pass: 30 fail: 92
I won't bother listing all of the failures; they are ava
On Sat 20-05-17 09:26:34, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 19-05-17 09:46:23, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > my qemu tests of next-20170519 show the following results:
> > total: 122 pass: 30 fail: 92
> >
> > I won't bother listing all of the failures; they are available at
> > http://kerne
The problem is due to 32-bit integer overflow in:
ADAPT_SCALE_BASE and adapt
In dcache_init_early() that is causing the problem. It was not enabled
before 'mm: drop HASH_ADAPT' but is enabled now, and it should follow
right after: "PID hash table entries: 1024 (order: 0, 4096 bytes)"
main()
On 05/20/2017 12:26 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 19-05-17 09:46:23, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Hi,
my qemu tests of next-20170519 show the following results:
total: 122 pass: 30 fail: 92
I won't bother listing all of the failures; they are available at
http://kerneltests.org/builders. I bi
On Fri 19-05-17 09:46:23, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my qemu tests of next-20170519 show the following results:
> total: 122 pass: 30 fail: 92
>
> I won't bother listing all of the failures; they are available at
> http://kerneltests.org/builders. I bisected one (openrisc, because
> it
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 9:46 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my qemu tests of next-20170519 show the following results:
> total: 122 pass: 30 fail: 92
>
> I won't bother listing all of the failures; they are available at
> http://kerneltests.org/builders. I bisected one (openrisc, becau
Hi,
my qemu tests of next-20170519 show the following results:
total: 122 pass: 30 fail: 92
I won't bother listing all of the failures; they are available at
http://kerneltests.org/builders. I bisected one (openrisc, because
it gives me some console output before dying). It points to
'mm:
8 matches
Mail list logo