Re: XDP maintainer match (Was [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring)

2020-11-19 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:59:28 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:09:53 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 17:35 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:46:34 -0800 Jakub Kicinski > > > wrote: > > > > > I think it is a good

Re: XDP maintainer match (Was [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring)

2020-11-19 Thread Jakub Kicinski
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 09:09:53 -0800 Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 17:35 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:46:34 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > > I think it is a good idea to change the keyword (K:), but I'm not sure > > this catch what we want, maybe

Re: XDP maintainer match (Was [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring)

2020-11-19 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2020-11-19 at 17:35 +0100, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:46:34 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > I think it is a good idea to change the keyword (K:), but I'm not sure > this catch what we want, maybe it does. The pattern match are meant to > catch drivers

XDP maintainer match (Was [PATCH v2 0/2] hwmon: (max127) Add Maxim MAX127 hardware monitoring)

2020-11-19 Thread Jesper Dangaard Brouer
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 07:46:34 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:26:53 -0800 Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 05:01:19PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 03:42:53PM -0800, Tao Ren wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 12:27:19AM