Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 20:15, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
Does linux-2.6.11-rc2 have both the linux-2.6.10-ac10 fix and the xattr
problem fixed?
Not sure about how much of -ac went in, but it has the xattr fix.
I've had my machine that would
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 20:15, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
> >>Does linux-2.6.11-rc2 have both the linux-2.6.10-ac10 fix and the xattr
> >>problem fixed?
> >Not sure about how much of -ac went in, but it has the xattr fix.
> I've had my machine that would crash daily if not hourly stay up
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:09, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
I wonder if there are several problems. Alan Cox claimed that there was
a fix in linux-2.6.10-ac10 that might alleviate the
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:09, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
I wonder if there are several problems. Alan Cox claimed that there was
a fix in linux-2.6.10-ac10 that might alleviate the
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 20:15, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
Does linux-2.6.11-rc2 have both the linux-2.6.10-ac10 fix and the xattr
problem fixed?
Not sure about how much of -ac went in, but it has the xattr fix.
I've had my machine that would crash daily if not hourly stay up for 10
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 20:15, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
Does linux-2.6.11-rc2 have both the linux-2.6.10-ac10 fix and the xattr
problem fixed?
Not sure about how much of -ac went in, but it has the xattr fix.
I've had my machine that would
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:09, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> >> Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
> >> Oops in kjournald
> I wonder if there are several problems. Alan Cox claimed that there was
> a fix in linux-2.6.10-ac10 that might alleviate the problem.
I'm not sure
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 21:31, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
That seems to have been due to the xattr problems recently fixed in
Linus's tree. The xattr race
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 21:31, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> For more of this look up subjects:
> Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
> Oops in kjournald
That seems to have been due to the xattr problems recently fixed in
Linus's tree. The xattr race was allowing one process
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 21:31, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
That seems to have been due to the xattr problems recently fixed in
Linus's tree. The xattr race was allowing one process to
Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-01-17 at 21:31, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
That seems to have been due to the xattr problems recently fixed in
Linus's tree. The xattr race
Hi,
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 15:09, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
I wonder if there are several problems. Alan Cox claimed that there was
a fix in linux-2.6.10-ac10 that might alleviate the problem.
I'm not sure --- there
Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
and from author:
Anders Saaby
I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the
Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
and from author:
Anders Saaby
I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
: I have a better patch than the one I gave you (attached below). If you
: send me a mail with steps to reproduce your remaining problems I'll put
: this very high on my TODO list after christmas. Btw, any chance you could
: try XFS CVS (which is at 2.6.9) + the patch
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
: I have a better patch than the one I gave you (attached below). If you
: send me a mail with steps to reproduce your remaining problems I'll put
: this very high on my TODO list after christmas. Btw, any chance you could
: try XFS CVS (which is at 2.6.9) + the patch
On Llu, 2005-01-17 at 21:31, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
> I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
> hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the problem
> need to talk to the powers who be to come up with a strategy to make a
> report they can use.
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
and from author:
Anders Saaby
I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the problem
need to talk to
Hi,
On Monday 17 January 2005 12:55, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
>
> Guess we've been struggeling with much of the same problems..
Seems like it. :)
> > ---
> > Scenario 2: Mailservers:
> > Running XFS on mailqueue:
>
> The 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 + 's/posix_lock_file/posix_lock_file_wait/' on
>
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
>
> Where should I begin? ;)
Guess we've been struggeling with much of the same problems..
> ---
> Scenario 2: Mailservers:
> Running XFS on mailqueue:
The 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 + 's/posix_lock_file/posix_lock_file_wait/' on
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:51:12PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 07:23:09PM +0100, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
> > So apart from the general well known instability problems that will
> > occur when you actually start *using* the system, there should be no
>
> What known
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:51:12PM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 07:23:09PM +0100, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
So apart from the general well known instability problems that will
occur when you actually start *using* the system, there should be no
What known
On Mon, Jan 17, 2005 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
Where should I begin? ;)
Guess we've been struggeling with much of the same problems..
---
Scenario 2: Mailservers:
Running XFS on mailqueue:
The 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 + 's/posix_lock_file/posix_lock_file_wait/' on
Hi,
On Monday 17 January 2005 12:55, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
Guess we've been struggeling with much of the same problems..
Seems like it. :)
---
Scenario 2: Mailservers:
Running XFS on mailqueue:
The 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 + 's/posix_lock_file/posix_lock_file_wait/' on
For more of this look up subjects:
Bad things happening to journaled filesystem machines
Oops in kjournald
and from author:
Anders Saaby
I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the problem
need to talk to
On Llu, 2005-01-17 at 21:31, Jeffrey Hundstad wrote:
I also can't keep a recent 2.6 or 2.6*-ac* kernel up more than a few
hours on a machine under real load. Perhaps us folks with the problem
need to talk to the powers who be to come up with a strategy to make a
report they can use. My
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:09:08PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
...
> > AFAIK the best you can do is to get the most recent XFS kernel from
> > SGI's CVS (this one is based on 2.6.10).
>
> The -mm tree also has these fixes; we'll get them merged into
> mainline soon.
Okeydokey - good
>
> > If
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 07:23:09PM +0100, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
> So apart from the general well known instability problems that will
> occur when you actually start *using* the system, there should be no
What known instabilities?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 07:23:09PM +0100, Jakob Oestergaard wrote:
So apart from the general well known instability problems that will
occur when you actually start *using* the system, there should be no
What known instabilities?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:09:08PM +1100, Nathan Scott wrote:
...
AFAIK the best you can do is to get the most recent XFS kernel from
SGI's CVS (this one is based on 2.6.10).
The -mm tree also has these fixes; we'll get them merged into
mainline soon.
Okeydokey - good
If you run that
30 matches
Mail list logo
