Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-17 Thread Luis Henriques
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:56:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] > > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-17 Thread Luis Henriques
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:56:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-11 Thread Dan Carpenter
I wasn't really expecting it to get a CVE since it requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN but I should have added the CC to stable. Sorry about that. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-11 Thread Dan Carpenter
I wasn't really expecting it to get a CVE since it requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN but I should have added the CC to stable. Sorry about that. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:45:54PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > >> > Security processes are not something that should be

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: >> > Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in >> > it's own private corner - if there's a problem

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > [CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ] > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add >> capability check to free

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:00:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in > > > it's own private corner - if there's

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > > Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in > > it's own private corner - if there's a problem upstream needs to > > take action on, then direct contact

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner >> wrote: >> > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner > wrote: > > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] > > > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques > >> wrote: >

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Ben Myers
Hi, On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:31:23AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > >>> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] > >>> > >>> On Mon,

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >>> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> >> Hi, >>

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: >> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] >> >> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: >> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques >> > wrote: >> > > On

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500,

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in it's own private corner - if there's a problem upstream needs to take action on, then

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:00:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in it's own private corner -

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: [CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ] On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add capability check to

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Kees Cook
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in it's own private

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:45:54PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: Security processes are

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Eric Sandeen
On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9,

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-10 Thread Ben Myers
Hi, On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:31:23AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques > > wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Dave Chinner
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques > wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Dave Chinner
[CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ] On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add > capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was > never sent to

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques wrote: > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add >> capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was >> never sent to -stable? From

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Luis Henriques
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add > capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was > never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8 > by

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Luis Henriques
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8 by

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was never sent

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Dave Chinner
[CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ] On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was never sent to -stable?

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Dave Chinner
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: Hi, It looks like

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-09 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org] On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800,

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-06 Thread Brian Foster
On 12/06/2013 09:43 AM, Dwight Engen wrote: > On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800 > Kees Cook wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add >> capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was >> never sent to -stable? From what I can

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-06 Thread Dwight Engen
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > Hi, > > It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add > capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was > never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8 > by

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-06 Thread Dwight Engen
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800 Kees Cook keesc...@google.com wrote: Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8 by

Re: XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-06 Thread Brian Foster
On 12/06/2013 09:43 AM, Dwight Engen wrote: On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800 Kees Cook keesc...@google.com wrote: Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was never sent to -stable? From what I

XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-05 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8 by 8ca149de80478441352a8622ea15fae7de703ced ("xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl").

XFS security fix never sent to -stable?

2013-12-05 Thread Kees Cook
Hi, It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8 by 8ca149de80478441352a8622ea15fae7de703ced (xfs: add XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl). I