On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:56:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 11:56:21PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
I wasn't really expecting it to get a CVE since it requires
CAP_SYS_ADMIN but I should have added the CC to stable. Sorry about
that.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
I wasn't really expecting it to get a CVE since it requires
CAP_SYS_ADMIN but I should have added the CC to stable. Sorry about
that.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:45:54PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> > Security processes are not something that should be
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> > Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in
>> > it's own private corner - if there's a problem
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ]
>
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add
>> capability check to free
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:00:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in
> > > it's own private corner - if there's
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in
> > it's own private corner - if there's a problem upstream needs to
> > take action on, then direct contact
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner
>> wrote:
>> > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner
> wrote:
> > [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
> >> wrote:
>
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:31:23AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >>> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
> >>>
> >>> On Mon,
On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
>> > wrote:
>> > > On
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com
wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:20:07AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com
wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in
it's own private corner - if there's a problem upstream needs to
take action on, then
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 01:00:07PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in
it's own private corner -
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
[CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ]
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add
capability check to
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
Security processes are not something that should be hidden away in
it's own private
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 06:45:54PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:00 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:10:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
Security processes are
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM
On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9,
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:31:23AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
On 12/10/13, 7:15 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> [cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
>
> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c
[CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ]
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add
> capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was
> never sent to
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add
>> capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was
>> never sent to -stable? From
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add
> capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was
> never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8
> by
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add
capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was
never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8
by
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add
capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was
never sent
[CC the xfs list. Kees - I shouldn't have to remind you to do this. ]
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add
capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was
never sent to -stable?
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
Hi,
It looks like
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55:23AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
[cc xfs list, cc sta...@vger.kernel.org]
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 08:17:09AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Luis Henriques
luis.henriq...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 04:35:50PM -0800,
On 12/06/2013 09:43 AM, Dwight Engen wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800
> Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add
>> capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was
>> never sent to -stable? From what I can
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800
Kees Cook wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add
> capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was
> never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8
> by
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800
Kees Cook keesc...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add
capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was
never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8
by
On 12/06/2013 09:43 AM, Dwight Engen wrote:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2013 16:35:50 -0800
Kees Cook keesc...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add
capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was
never sent to -stable? From what I
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c ("xfs: add
capability check to free eofblocks ioctl") is a security fix that was
never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8
by 8ca149de80478441352a8622ea15fae7de703ced ("xfs: add
XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl").
Hi,
It looks like 8c567a7fab6e086a0284eee2db82348521e7120c (xfs: add
capability check to free eofblocks ioctl) is a security fix that was
never sent to -stable? From what I can see, it was introduced in 3.8
by 8ca149de80478441352a8622ea15fae7de703ced (xfs: add
XFS_IOC_FREE_EOFBLOCKS ioctl).
I
42 matches
Mail list logo