On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:46:14AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> After I get back from LCA (all next week) I'll update the fsmark
> aio patches I have and retest this. The code looks pretty similar to
> the last "generic aio fsync" patch I wrote, so I'm guessing that the
> results will be pretty
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 09:46:14AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> After I get back from LCA (all next week) I'll update the fsmark
> aio patches I have and retest this. The code looks pretty similar to
> the last "generic aio fsync" patch I wrote, so I'm guessing that the
> results will be pretty
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:47:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this patch adds workqueue based fsync offload. Version of this
> patch have been floating around for a couple years, but we now
> have a user with seastar used by ScyllaDB (who sponsored this
> work) that really
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 08:47:46PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this patch adds workqueue based fsync offload. Version of this
> patch have been floating around for a couple years, but we now
> have a user with seastar used by ScyllaDB (who sponsored this
> work) that really
Hi all,
this patch adds workqueue based fsync offload. Version of this
patch have been floating around for a couple years, but we now
have a user with seastar used by ScyllaDB (who sponsored this
work) that really wants this in addition to the aio poll support.
More details are in the patch
Hi all,
this patch adds workqueue based fsync offload. Version of this
patch have been floating around for a couple years, but we now
have a user with seastar used by ScyllaDB (who sponsored this
work) that really wants this in addition to the aio poll support.
More details are in the patch
6 matches
Mail list logo