On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:58 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:53:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:48 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > Commit ea81531d ("s390/uaccess: fix page
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:58 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:53:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:48 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
Commit ea81531d (s390/uaccess: fix page table walk)
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:53:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:48 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Commit ea81531d ("s390/uaccess: fix page table walk")
> > > added this code. It looks like it should have
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:48 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Commit ea81531d ("s390/uaccess: fix page table walk")
> > added this code. It looks like it should have break;
> > for each case.
> no, the fallthrough is on purpose for
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Hello Heiko.
>
> Commit ea81531d ("s390/uaccess: fix page table walk")
> added this code. It looks like it should have break;
> for each case.
Hi Joe,
no, the fallthrough is on purpose for each case statement.
> static unsigned
Hello Heiko.
Commit ea81531d ("s390/uaccess: fix page table walk")
added this code. It looks like it should have break;
for each case.
static unsigned long follow_table(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address, int write)
{
unsigned
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
Hello Heiko.
Commit ea81531d (s390/uaccess: fix page table walk)
added this code. It looks like it should have break;
for each case.
Hi Joe,
no, the fallthrough is on purpose for each case statement.
static unsigned long
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:48 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
Commit ea81531d (s390/uaccess: fix page table walk)
added this code. It looks like it should have break;
for each case.
no, the fallthrough is on purpose for each case
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 10:53:27PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 07:48 +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:06:14PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
Commit ea81531d (s390/uaccess: fix page table walk)
added this code. It looks like it should have break;
Hello Heiko.
Commit ea81531d (s390/uaccess: fix page table walk)
added this code. It looks like it should have break;
for each case.
static unsigned long follow_table(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long address, int write)
{
unsigned long
10 matches
Mail list logo