Yes, your suggested descriptions more match the change.
I'm sending a new patch for your review. Thanks.
-Bin
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Bin Gao wrote:
>
> > MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support.
> > This is also true for
Yes, your suggested descriptions more match the change.
I'm sending a new patch for your review. Thanks.
-Bin
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Bin Gao bin@linux.intel.com wrote:
MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support.
This
* Bin Gao wrote:
> MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support.
> This is also true for systems that have SFI in place.
>
> So this patch is to exclude X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Gao
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig |2 +-
> 1
MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support.
This is also true for systems that have SFI in place.
So this patch is to exclude X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present.
Signed-off-by: Bin Gao
---
arch/x86/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support.
This is also true for systems that have SFI in place.
So this patch is to exclude X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present.
Signed-off-by: Bin Gao bin@intel.com
---
arch/x86/Kconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1
* Bin Gao bin@linux.intel.com wrote:
MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support.
This is also true for systems that have SFI in place.
So this patch is to exclude X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present.
Signed-off-by: Bin Gao bin@intel.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo