Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-25 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 02/23/2008 12:48 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: > > I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with > interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel > works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. > "nosmp" disables the IO-APIC which will change

Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-25 Thread Chuck Ebbert
On 02/23/2008 12:48 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. nosmp disables the IO-APIC which will change interrupt

Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Vegard Nossum
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O> I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with > > > interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel > > works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. > > Almost certainly

Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Vegard Nossum
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > O> I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with > > > interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel > > works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. > > Almost certainly

Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Alan Cox
O> I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with > interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel > works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. Almost certainly interrupt routing try smp but with noapic and see if it fails as well ? -- To

ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Vegard Nossum
en summary: scsi0 : ahci scsi1 : ahci ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf884c100 ctl 0x bmdma 0x000... ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf884c180 ctl 0x bmdma 0x000... ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error

ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Vegard Nossum
: scsi0 : ahci scsi1 : ahci ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf884c100 ctl 0x bmdma 0x000... ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xf884c180 ctl 0x bmdma 0x000... ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300) ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4

Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Alan Cox
O I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. Almost certainly interrupt routing try smp but with noapic and see if it fails as well ? -- To unsubscribe

Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Vegard Nossum
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: O I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. Almost certainly interrupt

Re: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4)

2008-02-23 Thread Vegard Nossum
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 7:31 PM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: O I don't see the connection between (no-)smp and ata. Something with interrupt routing/IPI, missing irq ack? Booting another !SMP kernel works fine. The problem also exists in 2.6.24-rc2. Almost certainly interrupt