Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Alan Cox wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:11 +0200 (EET) Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you stick a stack trace in at that point ? That would help diagnose it a great deal quicker. Finally done - found out hard way that BUG() is too bad and dump_st5ack() suits me better. Thanks.

Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

2007-12-01 Thread Meelis Roos
> Thanks. This should fix the real cause, and also allow for port start to > fail politely with -ENODEV. Works fine here - no more strange messages. Thank you! -- Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message

Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

2007-12-01 Thread Meelis Roos
Thanks. This should fix the real cause, and also allow for port start to fail politely with -ENODEV. Works fine here - no more strange messages. Thank you! -- Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to

Re: [PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Alan Cox wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:11 +0200 (EET) Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you stick a stack trace in at that point ? That would help diagnose it a great deal quicker. Finally done - found out hard way that BUG() is too bad and dump_st5ack() suits me better. Thanks.

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-30 Thread Alessandro Suardi
x90 > [] sys_init_module+0x121/0x1550 > [] vma_prio_tree_insert+0x1f/0x50 > [] ata_std_prereset+0x0/0x160 [libata] > [] do_mmap_pgoff+0x298/0x320 > [] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > [] packet_setsockopt+0xf0/0x3b0 > === > ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) Mine

[PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

2007-11-30 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:11 +0200 (EET) Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Can you stick a stack trace in at that point ? That would help diagnose > > it a great deal quicker. > > Finally done - found out hard way that BUG() is too bad and > dump_st5ack() suits me better. Thanks. This

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-30 Thread Meelis Roos
/0x3b0 === ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) -- Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/maj

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-30 Thread Craig Schlenter
rrupt :00:1f.1[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.1 to 64 ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :00:1f.1 disabled ata_piix :00:1f.1: version 2.12 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.1[A] -> GSI 16

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-30 Thread Alessandro Suardi
=== ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) --alessandro Damaged people are dangerous. They know they can survive. (Anna Barton/Juliette Binoche, 'Damage') - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

[PATCH] libata: Fix early use of port printk. (Was Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19))

2007-11-30 Thread Alan Cox
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:34:11 +0200 (EET) Meelis Roos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you stick a stack trace in at that point ? That would help diagnose it a great deal quicker. Finally done - found out hard way that BUG() is too bad and dump_st5ack() suits me better. Thanks. This should

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-30 Thread Meelis Roos
[d48d12f0] ata_std_prereset+0x0/0x160 [libata] [c0155648] do_mmap_pgoff+0x298/0x320 [c0104086] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [c02b] packet_setsockopt+0xf0/0x3b0 === ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) -- Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-30 Thread Craig Schlenter
to 64 ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :00:1f.1 disabled ata_piix :00:1f.1: version 2.12 ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1f.1[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1f.1 to 64 scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-29 Thread Alessandro Suardi
On Nov 28, 2007 9:07 PM, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This message comes from 2.6.24-rc3 + todays git, version > > a531a141089714efe39eca89593524fdf05104f2. I did grep the logs and found > > that it first appeared in 2.6.24-rc1 (+ some git mayve) on Nov 3. > > I used 2.6.23 before that

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-29 Thread Alessandro Suardi
On Nov 28, 2007 9:07 PM, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This message comes from 2.6.24-rc3 + todays git, version a531a141089714efe39eca89593524fdf05104f2. I did grep the logs and found that it first appeared in 2.6.24-rc1 (+ some git mayve) on Nov 3. I used 2.6.23 before that and it did

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-28 Thread Alan Cox
> This message comes from 2.6.24-rc3 + todays git, version > a531a141089714efe39eca89593524fdf05104f2. I did grep the logs and found > that it first appeared in 2.6.24-rc1 (+ some git mayve) on Nov 3. > I used 2.6.23 before that and it did not show this message. Can you stick a stack trace in

ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-28 Thread Meelis Roos
b1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found hub 1-0:1.0: 2 ports detected libata version 3.00 loaded. ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) ata_piix :00:07.1: version 2.12 Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 cm

ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-28 Thread Meelis Roos
libata version 3.00 loaded. ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19) ata_piix :00:07.1: version 2.12 Floppy drive(s): fd0 is 1.44M scsi0 : ata_piix scsi1 : ata_piix ata1: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x1f0 ctl 0x3f6 bmdma 0x1800 irq 14 ata2: PATA max UDMA/33 cmd 0x170 ctl 0x376 bmdma 0x1808 irq 15

Re: ata4294967295: failed to start port (errno=-19)

2007-11-28 Thread Alan Cox
This message comes from 2.6.24-rc3 + todays git, version a531a141089714efe39eca89593524fdf05104f2. I did grep the logs and found that it first appeared in 2.6.24-rc1 (+ some git mayve) on Nov 3. I used 2.6.23 before that and it did not show this message. Can you stick a stack trace in at