Re: [PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

>> @@ -708,11 +708,11 @@ static void svc_addr(struct seq_file *seq, struct >> sockaddr_atmsvc *addr) >> static int e164[] = { 1, 8, 4, 6, 1, 0 }; >> >> if (*addr->sas_addr.pub) { >> - seq_printf(seq, "%s", addr->sas_addr.pub); >> + seq_puts(seq,

Re: [PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

>> @@ -708,11 +708,11 @@ static void svc_addr(struct seq_file *seq, struct >> sockaddr_atmsvc *addr) >> static int e164[] = { 1, 8, 4, 6, 1, 0 }; >> >> if (*addr->sas_addr.pub) { >> - seq_printf(seq, "%s", addr->sas_addr.pub); >> + seq_puts(seq,

Re: [PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 11:44 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100 > > Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. > Thus use the function "seq_puts"

Re: [PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 11:44 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100 > > Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. > Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". > > This issue was detected by using

Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

>> Is the function "seq_puts" a bit more efficient for the desired output >> of a single string in comparison to calling the function "seq_printf" >> for this purpose? > > Will you please be so kind and tell us? How do you think about to get the run time characteristics for these sequence output

Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

>> Is the function "seq_puts" a bit more efficient for the desired output >> of a single string in comparison to calling the function "seq_printf" >> for this purpose? > > Will you please be so kind and tell us? How do you think about to get the run time characteristics for these sequence output

Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:19:17 +0100 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. > >> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". > >> > >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle

Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:19:17 +0100 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. > >> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". > >> > >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > > > Can you please

Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

>> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. >> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". >> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Can you please explain what the issue really is and what you're trying > to do here? Is the

Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

>> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. >> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". >> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Can you please explain what the issue really is and what you're trying > to do here? Is the

Re: [PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:44:08 +0100 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100 > > Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. > Thus use the function "seq_puts"

Re: [PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:44:08 +0100 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100 > > Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. > Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". > > This issue was detected by using

[PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100 Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by:

[PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100 Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls. Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf". This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring ---