Re: belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 March 2007, Con Kolivas wrote: >On 02/03/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Greetings; >> >> I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running >> was about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell >> going I went to it and ran htop which

Re: belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 March 2007, Gene Heskett wrote: >Greetings; > >I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running > was about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell going > I went to it and ran htop which showed that the bulldog monitor was > taking 90% of the cpu.

Re: belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-01 Thread Con Kolivas
On 02/03/07, Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Greetings; I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running was about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell going I went to it and ran htop which showed that the bulldog monitor was taking 90% of the

belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-01 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings; I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running was about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell going I went to it and ran htop which showed that the bulldog monitor was taking 90% of the cpu. Killed it, then restarted it, but when I ran the

belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-01 Thread Gene Heskett
Greetings; I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running was about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell going I went to it and ran htop which showed that the bulldog monitor was taking 90% of the cpu. Killed it, then restarted it, but when I ran the

Re: belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-01 Thread Con Kolivas
On 02/03/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings; I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running was about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell going I went to it and ran htop which showed that the bulldog monitor was taking 90% of the cpu.

Re: belkin bulldog ups monitor vs 2.6.21-rc2

2007-03-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Friday 02 March 2007, Con Kolivas wrote: On 02/03/07, Gene Heskett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Greetings; I just rebooted to 2.6.21-rc2 and noted that getting x up and running was about 15 seconds longer than usual. When it got a bash shell going I went to it and ran htop which showed that