This is because Jakub fixed it in GCC 3.0 CVS at the same time that he
fixed it in 2.96-82, which was on the same day it was reported. It
was broken in GCC CVS until that moment.
Cheers,
Matt
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > As this is with Red Hat's version of
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
> OH. I kept looking for a package called 'kgcc'. Silly me.
>
> Guess it's time for a "How to compile a kernel on Red Hat 7.1" FAQ.
The answer is that you can safely use gcc 2.96. No need to install kgcc or
any other old compiler.
LLaP
bero
-
To
Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
> >Since there is no kgcc in RH71,
>
> There is an compat-egcs RPM (on CD2?) that contains kgcc. Took me a while
> to find that.
OH. I kept looking for a package called 'kgcc'. Silly me.
Guess it's time for a "How to compile a kernel on Red Hat 7.1" FAQ.
- Dan
-
To
This bug is fixed in gcc-2.96-82 and higher, as per
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054. I've posted
gcc-2.96-84.src.rpm at your enterprise ftp folder.
--jeremy
Jim Wright wrote:
>
> We believe we have found a bug in gcc. We have been trying to track
> down why the
: On Wed, 9 May 2001 11:09:14 +0200 (CEST), Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
>On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
>> > Any suggestions for a way to cope with this? We have a
>> > customer who's system fails due to this.
>>
>> You can build 2.4 quite sanely with egcs-1.1.2 (aka kgcc)
>
>Since there is no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> This was fixed in 2.96-82, see:
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054
> It was a bug in the if conversion optimization.
So if I run up2date, will I get the fixed version?
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Any suggestions for a way to cope with this? We have a
> > customer who's system fails due to this.
>
> You can build 2.4 quite sanely with egcs-1.1.2 (aka kgcc)
Since there is no kgcc in RH71, will you be releasing an updated gcc
rpm, or is the best
> As this is with Red Hat's version of gcc, I'm not sending
> this to the gcc folks. RPMs of gcc with this problem
(If you have the time check 3.0 CVS doesnt show the same problem, the RH tree
diverges from it so may well be unique in having the bug but many bugs are
shared)
> include
This bug is fixed in gcc-2.96-82 and higher, as per
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054. I've posted
gcc-2.96-84.src.rpm at your enterprise ftp folder.
--jeremy
Jim Wright wrote:
We believe we have found a bug in gcc. We have been trying to track
down why the
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Any suggestions for a way to cope with this? We have a
customer who's system fails due to this.
You can build 2.4 quite sanely with egcs-1.1.2 (aka kgcc)
Since there is no kgcc in RH71, will you be releasing an updated gcc
rpm, or is the best solution
As this is with Red Hat's version of gcc, I'm not sending
this to the gcc folks. RPMs of gcc with this problem
(If you have the time check 3.0 CVS doesnt show the same problem, the RH tree
diverges from it so may well be unique in having the bug but many bugs are
shared)
include
This is because Jakub fixed it in GCC 3.0 CVS at the same time that he
fixed it in 2.96-82, which was on the same day it was reported. It
was broken in GCC CVS until that moment.
Cheers,
Matt
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
As this is with Red Hat's version of gcc,
Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
Since there is no kgcc in RH71,
There is an compat-egcs RPM (on CD2?) that contains kgcc. Took me a while
to find that.
OH. I kept looking for a package called 'kgcc'. Silly me.
Guess it's time for a How to compile a kernel on Red Hat 7.1 FAQ.
- Dan
-
To
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Dan Kegel wrote:
OH. I kept looking for a package called 'kgcc'. Silly me.
Guess it's time for a How to compile a kernel on Red Hat 7.1 FAQ.
The answer is that you can safely use gcc 2.96. No need to install kgcc or
any other old compiler.
LLaP
bero
-
To unsubscribe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
This was fixed in 2.96-82, see:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37054
It was a bug in the if conversion optimization.
So if I run up2date, will I get the fixed version?
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
: On Wed, 9 May 2001 11:09:14 +0200 (CEST), Tobias Ringstrom wrote:
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Any suggestions for a way to cope with this? We have a
customer who's system fails due to this.
You can build 2.4 quite sanely with egcs-1.1.2 (aka kgcc)
Since there is no kgcc in
16 matches
Mail list logo