Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Gerd Knorr
> > Come to think of it .. then we'd start getting "buz drivers missing" > > reports. > > So what? > Refer them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll explain them how > to use the new zoran driver until it's in the official kernel... #warning "outdated, see http://whatever for current devel versions"

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Ronald Bultje
On 2001.04.30 20:37:39 +0200 Mohammad A. Haque wrote: > On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it > will > > go away, until then I simply dont care. At least its obviously broken > right > > now > > Can't we just remove it

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it will > go away, until then I simply dont care. At least its obviously broken right > now Can't we just remove it then? Come to think of it .. then we'd start getting "buz drivers

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Alan Cox
> I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put > define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE131072 > borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of this. > below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake. Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it will go

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Alan Cox
I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE131072 borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of this. below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake. Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it will go away,

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Mohammad A. Haque
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it will go away, until then I simply dont care. At least its obviously broken right now Can't we just remove it then? Come to think of it .. then we'd start getting buz drivers missing

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Ronald Bultje
On 2001.04.30 20:37:39 +0200 Mohammad A. Haque wrote: On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Alan Cox wrote: Buz.c doesnt work build or anything. Once the zoran merge is done it will go away, until then I simply dont care. At least its obviously broken right now Can't we just remove it then?

Re: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-30 Thread Gerd Knorr
Come to think of it .. then we'd start getting buz drivers missing reports. So what? Refer them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll explain them how to use the new zoran driver until it's in the official kernel... #warning outdated, see http://whatever for current devel versions Gerd --

RE: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-28 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hi, >I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put >define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE 131072 >borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of >this. >below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake. my fix in an earlier e-mail to the list explained that the proper way of fixing it

buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-28 Thread Byeong-ryeol Kim
I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE 131072 borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of this. below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake. -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux-2.4.4/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2

RE: buz.c of 2.4.4

2001-04-28 Thread Ronald Bultje
Hi, I met follwing erros which was workarounded by put define KMALLOC_MAXSIZE 131072 borrowed from af_unix.c of 2.4.3-ac14. But I'm convinced of this. below lines were wrapped by me for readabilities' sake. my fix in an earlier e-mail to the list explained that the proper way of fixing it is